Correct equations of motion for object?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simulating an object rotating around an axis while bouncing on yarn, with the main issue being energy conservation when incorporating yarn torque. The user notes that while gravity torque conserves energy, the upward-directed yarn torque causes the object to gain energy and bounce higher. Suggestions include analyzing the system without gravity and considering Lagrangian mechanics to derive the correct equations of motion. It is emphasized that momentum conservation during collisions is crucial for the simulation's accuracy. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for a proper modeling approach to ensure energy conservation.
Simon666
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am currently trying to simulate an object that can rotate around an axis bouncing on a piece of yarn. I have as equations of motion for the object:

I d²Theta/dt² = Gravity_Torque + Yarn_Torque

With the gravity torque alone this system is perfectly conserving energy: the rotating lever will rotate down from horizontal to horizontal at the other side and back. However, if I also put in the yarn torque, this is only directed upwards, so in my simulations the lever will bounce back from the yarn higher than the position it left from and hence energy is continuously added and my object will bounce back higher and higher. How to solve this issue, what are the correct equations of motion? I'm not so good at physics.

In attachment the situation is displayed.
 

Attachments

  • Test.JPG
    Test.JPG
    38.4 KB · Views: 459
Physics news on Phys.org
The object can't bounce off with more energy it arrived with. I don't know what you mean by yarn torque. Is this the resistance caused by stretching the yarn ?

You should try analysing the system as if there were no gravity, in which case it is like a SHO with a period of free fall in the middle.

It's not a trivial problem. Do you know how to work out EOMs with Lagrange's method ?
 
Mentz114 said:
You should try analysing the system as if there were no gravity, in which case it is like a SHO with a period of free fall in the middle.

It's not a trivial problem. Do you know how to work out EOMs with Lagrange's method ?
Sorry, I'm being a bit overwhelmed. No I don't know those things. I do suspect the equations of motion used for the object are alright but the interaction with the yarn is at fault. The yarn is discretized in a number of 0-dimensional nodes. I have discovered a flaw in my modeling though. I have modeled the effect of collision of the nodes with the object: they can bounce off of the object but then the object should get a momentum change in the opposite direction, which I have not modeled yet. That I have not modeled yet. I don't know though whether that will suffice to make the system conserve energy. I'll get back here when it doesn't.
 
they can bounce off of the object but then the object should get a momentum change in the opposite direction,
Yes, it is vital that objects bouncing off each other should conserve momentum or your simulation is bound to fail.
 
I don't understand your example well enough to give you the equations of motion for it, but the general equations of motion for a rigid body can be described by Euler's equations .

Euler's equations use body-fixed coordinates. It looks to me like you might be using absolute space coordinates, in which case you can't use the above directly as written.

The topic is discussed in Goldstein's "Classical mechanics", but since it's a graduate level textbook and you say your math is not that great, it might be a bit advanced.

Unfortunately I don't understand the exact coordinate choice you've made to be able to give you any specifics.

If your body is constrained to rotate only in a plane, I.e. if you assume the yarn and the body are always coplanar, you might be able to generate the equations of motions by using Lagrangian mechanics.

Using a Lagrangian approach, if the yarn doesn't stretch and has some constant length L, the state of a planar system should be able to be described by two angles, the angle between the yarn and the vertical, and the angle between the end of your rod and the yarn, along with characteristics of the problem such as the length of the yarn, and the moment of inertia (i.e. mass, length, width) of the rod.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top