I Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Propn 1.82 ....

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading the book: "Advanced Modern Algebra" (Second Edition) by Joseph J. Rotman ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 1: Groups I ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Proposition 1.82 (Correspondence Theorem) ...

Proposition 1.82 reads as follows:
Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png

Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png

In the above proof by Rotman we read the following:

" ... ... For the reverse inclusion let ##a \in \pi^{-1} \pi (S)##, so that ##\pi (a) = \pi (s)## for some ##s \in S##. It follows that ##as^{-1} \in \text{ ker } \pi = K## ... ... "Can someone please explain exactly how/why ##\pi (a) = \pi (s)## implies that ##as^{-1} \in \text{ ker } \pi = K## ... ...?Peter

===========================================================================================***EDIT***

Just had some thoughts ... BUT ... unfortunately my logic does not seem to line up with Rotman's logic ...

My thoughts are as follows:

##\pi (a) = \pi (s)##

##\Longrightarrow aK = sK##

##\Longrightarrow a = sk## for some ##k \in K## since ##a## must belong to ##sK## ... ... (is this a legitimate step ...)

##\Longrightarrow s^{-1} a = k##

##\Longrightarrow as^{-1} = k##

##\Longrightarrow as^{-1} \in \text{ker } \pi = K##Is that correct?

BUT note ... logic is different from Rotman's set of steps ... ... what is Rotman's logic ...?Peter
 

Attachments

  • Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png
    Rotman - 1 - Proposition 1.82 ... .png
    47.7 KB · Views: 461
  • Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png
    Rotman - 2 - Proposition 1.82 ... .PART 2 .png
    13.6 KB · Views: 377
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\operatorname{ker}\pi = \{a \in G\,\vert \,\pi(a)=[e] \in G/K\}## and ##[e] \in G/K## is the coset ##e\cdot K##. Important is that ##\pi## is a group homomorphism:
$$
\pi(a)=\pi(s) \Longrightarrow \pi(a)\cdot \pi(s)^{-1}=\pi(as^{-1})=[e] \in G/K \Longrightarrow as^{-1}\in \operatorname{ker}\pi
$$
by definition of the kernel. Now which elements of ##G## map to ##G/K \ni [e]= e\cdot K\,##?
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
Hi fresh_42 ... thanks for the help ...

Which elements map to ##e_{G/K} = e_{G} K## ... ?

I think it is all the elements of the normal group ##K## ... Is that correct?

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
Hi fresh_42 ... thanks for the help ...

Which elements map to ##e_{G/K} = e_{G} K## ... ?

I think it is all the elements of the normal group ##K## ... Is that correct?

Peter
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
The canonical map ##\pi## is a homomorphism (easy exercise). Hence, ##\pi(a) = \pi(s) \implies \pi(as^{-1}) = \pi(a)\pi(s)^{-1} = e \implies as^{-1} \in \ker \pi##
 
  • Like
Likes Math Amateur
Thanks Math_QED ... most helpful and clear ..

Peter
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top