Correspondence Theorem in Group Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Correspondence Theorem in Group Theory, specifically focusing on a proof involving a normal subgroup ##N## of a group ##G## and the relationship between subgroups of the quotient group ##G/N## and subgroups of ##G##. Participants are exploring a specific part of the proof that discusses the subset ##\beta(H^*)## and its properties.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding why the normal subgroup ##N## is contained within the subset ##\beta(H^*)##, which is defined as ##\{g\in G:gN\in H^*\}##.
  • Another participant suggests that the identity of the subgroup ##H^*## is the coset ##N##, implying that the identity element ##1## belongs to ##\beta(H^*)##.
  • A subsequent reply confirms that since ##N## is a subgroup and contains the identity element, it follows that ##\beta(H^*)## contains at least one element from ##N##.
  • Further clarification is provided that for each element ##g## in ##N##, the relation ##gN = N## holds, thus confirming that ##g## is in ##\beta(H^*)##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to reach a mutual understanding regarding the inclusion of ##N## in ##\beta(H^*)##, but the initial confusion indicates that there may still be nuances or details that are not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve all assumptions or dependencies related to the properties of the subgroup ##H^*## or the implications of the proof steps. Some mathematical steps remain implicit and may require further elaboration.

TheShrike
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm following the proof for this theorem in my textbook, and there is one part of it that I can't understand. Hopefully you can help me. Here is the part of the theorem and proof up to where I'm stuck:

Let ##N## be a normal subgroup of a group ##G##. Then every subgroup of the quotient group ##G/N## is of the form ##H/N## for some subgroup ##H## of ##G## with ##H\le G##.

...

Proof: Let ##H^*## be a subgroup of ##G/N## so that it consists of a certain set ##\{hN\}## of left cosets of ##N## in ##G##. We define the subset ##\beta(H^*)## of ##G## to be ##\{g\in G:gN\in H^*\}##. Then ##\beta(H^*)## clearly contains N and is a subgroup of G:

[here follows demonstration that ##\beta(H^*)## is a subgroup of G]


The portion in red is what I'm having trouble with. I don't see why it's immediately clear that ##N## is contained within ##\beta(H^*)##.

Any help is appreciated.

I first thought that perhaps ##H^*## is supposed to correspond to the ##H## of the hypothesis, but then I realized that cannot be true, since the elements of ##\beta(H^*)## would be precisely those of ##H## and the properties would be trivial. In particular, proving that ##\beta(H^*)## is a subgroup of ##G## would be pointless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the identity of ##H^*## exactly the coset ##N##?
 
That's correct. So we know the identity element ##1## belongs to ##\beta(H*)##. We also know that ##N## is a subgroup, so ##1\in N##. Therefore ##\beta(H*)## contains at least one element of ##N##.
 
TheShrike said:
...

We define the subset ##\beta(H^*)## of ##G## to be ##\{g\in G:gN\in H^*\}##.

For each g \in N ,\ gN = N and N \in H^*, so g\in \beta(H^*)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Ah, well that clears that up. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
816
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K