1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Could a spacecraft refuel from the atmosphere?

  1. Mar 8, 2018 #1


    User Avatar

  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 8, 2018 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Pretty neat article, thanks. But it doesn't seem to match your thread title, or your question about dipping into the atmosphere to "store" O2. The technology in the article appears to rely on a continuous high-velocity, low-density atmospheric flux to operate at low thrust values, no?
  4. Mar 8, 2018 #3


    User Avatar

    Yes, but the thrust motor, AFAIK, collects the molecules into a chamber as a low density gas as part of the process. At this point, some could be pumped off into a pressure vessel.
    The thrust values are low, but if the orbit was a high elliptical one, there would be time to rebuild velocity and re-position for each skimming dip into the outer edge of the atmosphere.
  5. Mar 8, 2018 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Using what energy source?
  6. Mar 8, 2018 #5


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm still confused. You used the word "fuel" in your title and the article is about reaction mass. Which one do you actually mean? By posting the article you imply your idea is similar, but it looks to me like it isn't.
  7. Mar 13, 2018 #6
    Well, this idea is actually a basic Bussard Ramjet without fusion (and due the less effective 'gather' part it would rely on an atmosphere).

    As long as you can give it enough power to counter the drag, it'll fly. But where would the power come from?
  8. Mar 15, 2018 #7
    The original article relies on solar power for the actual energy. If you dip into the atmosphere with solar panels of any significant size, they will fall off, or burn off.

    You pretty much end up with a low-power solar-powered space plane (aerodynamically shaped solar "wings") with an ion engine that is only usable around Earth and Venus (no atmosphere on Mercury, not enough sunlight further out unless your wings are enormous) - or you end up with a flying nuke. And not an RTG kind of nuke, but a real nuclear reactor. Because, with current tech:
    - a 24 kW (24 thousand Watt) HiPEP produces 460 mN of thrust (half a Newton), ie 1/20th of earth acceleration for a kilogram of payload.
    - An RTG (radio-thermal generator) produces maybe 5 Watt of electricity per kilogram.
    - So you need a 4800 kg machine for 1/20th kg of thrust.
    (Yes, GOCE used solar, but it had 20 mN of Thrust.)

    As for the nuclear option, I guess I will refer you to this thread: http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=104814 . They end up with a 500kg reactor for 1MW power. That enables very high-power electric propulsion that reaches chemical propulsion forces. But you end up with an actual nuclear fission reactor on your ship.
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2018
  9. Mar 19, 2018 at 10:16 PM #8

    stefan r

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The kilogram is not a unit of thrust.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads - spacecraft refuel atmosphere Date
Thermal Management Question in Spacecraft Jul 28, 2015
Solar sail with Ion thruster Jul 3, 2015
Atmospheric CO2 removal technologies? Jun 24, 2015
In Atmosphere Ion Drive(Assess Viability For Spacecraft) Jul 27, 2011