Could Gravity Ever Be Repulsive? Exploring Theories and Possibilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riogho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Repulsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of gravity being repulsive, contrasting it with other forces that exhibit both attraction and repulsion. Participants explore the idea that at extremely small scales, such as the Planck length, gravity might behave differently, potentially becoming repulsive due to the density of gravitons. There is skepticism about the lack of evidence supporting this notion, with some suggesting that the weak nature of gravity could allow for such repulsion to exist, albeit subtly. The conversation also touches on dark matter, questioning why it doesn't clump together if it only interacts gravitationally, with explanations involving angular momentum and scattering cross sections. Overall, the thread highlights ongoing curiosity and speculation about gravity's fundamental nature and its interactions.
Riogho
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Every other force attracts and repels, gravity does not. Gravity only attracts. This is assymmetrical. We like to assume things that are not symmetrical are wrong. Why do we not assume this is wrong?

Is there any possible way gravity could be repulsive? I know there is staggering amounts of evidence to suggest it isn't, but why not on very small lengths, say Planck length, that gravity actually becomes repulsive.

Maybe the repulsion is just "gravitons" get so thick in an exchange between two particles it just pushes them away to a very small length until the density of them goes down.

Things like this idea would solve the idea of a singularity existing at the center black holes and such.

Do we have any experimental data at such small scales? Do we have anything that disproves an idea like this?

Just wondering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Search for the phrase "The nuclear force is only felt among hadrons. At much smaller separations between nucleons the force is very powerfully repulsive," in

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force

How could anyone find a gravitational force at small distances with strongly interacting particles around? Perhaps using weakly-interacting non-electromagnetic particles?

Bob S
 
Theres no evidence that gravity can be repulsed or even changed.
Yes that doesn't fit into the pattern but that's not a very good reason to base anything on.
 
Bob S said:
How could anyone find a gravitational force at small distances with strongly interacting particles around? Perhaps using weakly-interacting non-electromagnetic particles?

Bob S

Maybe the inability to see it is why we think it isn't there. Perhaps there is some way to assume what it is SUPPOSED to be, and we can see if there is any difference between that and what we experimentally see. Maybe the difference is gravity.

Because gravity is very weak anyway, the repulsion would logically be weak.

Also, on another related question (so as not to make another thread), if dark matter only interacts through the gravitational force, why is it not all just clumped together in one spot? Since there is no electromagnetic force to repulse it.
 
Riogho said:
if dark matter only interacts through the gravitational force, why is it not all just clumped together in one spot? Since there is no electromagnetic force to repulse it.
A negligible scattering cross section plus remanent angular momentum of individual dark-matter particles around galactic centers will prevent clumping.
Bob S
 
Last edited:
A point in space where the total magnitude of energy is less than zero from our frame of reference. Better known as the theoretical negative mass. Let's just say physics isn't directly touching that subject yet, but there are people thinking about it.

Oh and it's pretty arrogant to assume dark matter doesn't contain it's own particles of time interaction capable of repulsing each other. Do you really think everything is just made of protons/neutrons/electrons?
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top