Could Pluto support an atmosphere of methane?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Pluto can support an atmosphere of methane (CH4) based on calculations involving its escape velocity and molecular energy. The escape velocity for Pluto is approximately 1160 m/s, while the calculated speed of methane molecules is around 280 m/s, indicating that the molecules do not possess sufficient energy to escape Pluto's gravitational pull. The analysis utilized the equipartition theorem to determine molecular energy and the escape velocity formula derived from gravitational principles. This confirms that methane can exist in a stable atmosphere on Pluto despite potential slow atmospheric loss.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with the equipartition theorem
  • Knowledge of escape velocity calculations
  • Basic concepts of molecular energy and gravitational forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the equipartition theorem in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about escape velocity calculations for celestial bodies
  • Explore the properties of methane as a planetary atmosphere
  • Investigate atmospheric loss mechanisms in low-gravity environments
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, planetary scientists, and students studying celestial mechanics and atmospheric science will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the atmospheric conditions of dwarf planets like Pluto.

PeterPoPS
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pluto is believed to have a radius of 1500 km, a mass of 1.5x10^22 kg, and a surface temperature of 55 K. Could Pluto support an atmosphere of methane, CH4?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


First some information:
The problem is from a book "Introductory Statistical Mechanics", so far topics like basic thermodynamics, some probability / statistics and the canonical ensemble together with the equipartion theorem have been brought up.
-----------
My guess to solve the problem was to get the energy of the molecule via the equipartion theorem (E=\frac{3k_{B}T}{2}), only having 3 degrees of freedom since the rest (vibrational and rotational) are "frozen out". And somehow relate the energy to some centripetal force pushing the molecule towards the planet. The problem with this idea is that I need the rotational velocity i think? And none is given in the problem. Also, the centripetal force will be calculated macroscopically giving a very large force and the energy from the equipartion theorem is very small so they are not comparable.
-----------
The answer to the problem is: Yes (Pluto can support an atmosphere of methane)

Best regards Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the escape velocity.
 
Borek said:
Think about the escape velocity.

Thank you! But do I not need the Gravitational constant for Pluto to do that calculation?

If found an approximation on Wikipedia "Escape velocity"
"For a body with a spherically-symmetric distribution of mass, the barycentric escape velocity ve from the surface (in m/s) is approximately 2.364×10^{-5} m^{1.5}kg^{-0.5}s^{-1} times the radius r (in meters) times the square root of the average density ρ (in kg/m³), or:"
v_e \approx 2.364\times10^{-5}r\sqrt{\rho}

Calculating with this equations i get that the speed of the molecule is around 280m/s and that the escape velocity is around 1160m/s, indicating that the molecules does not have enough energy to leave the planet.

Is this the way you were thinking of? I'm just having doubts because I had to look up the equation for escape velocity and the molar mass for CH4 (which maybe I should have known)
 
That's more or less approach I was thinking about.

There are some details here that I am not sure about (there is always fraction of the gas that is fast enough to escape, so in fact atmosphere can be "bleeding" all the time, just very slowly), so second opinion won't hurt. But from what I know what you did is the most important step.
 
Borek said:
That's more or less approach I was thinking about.

There are some details here that I am not sure about (there is always fraction of the gas that is fast enough to escape, so in fact atmosphere can be "bleeding" all the time, just very slowly), so second opinion won't hurt. But from what I know what you did is the most important step.

Thank you very much!

About the atmosphere "bleeding", I think that could be neglected because as you say it is not the most important part of the problem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
902
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K