Could Silicon-Based Lifeforms Exist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yolo123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms Life
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility of silicon-based lifeforms, highlighting that lower activation energy compared to bond energies may facilitate chemical processes necessary for life. It raises the question of whether alternative mechanisms could support life beyond carbon, suggesting that a carbon-poor environment might be essential for such evolution. The conversation also touches on the diversity of bonding capabilities required for non-carbon-based life and references external sources discussing the challenges of silicon biochemistry. Overall, the feasibility of silicon lifeforms remains uncertain due to various chemical complexities. The topic invites further exploration of what constitutes life and its potential biochemical foundations.
yolo123
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi, I saw this problem in my textbook.
(Please see attached picture.)

So, first of all, my answer to this question would be that since the activation energy is lower than the bond energies, it is very easy to provide enough energy for the process to occur. Most importantly, is my answer right?

Now, for the fun part, does this mean there could be silicon based lifeforms?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-04-21 at 1.22.30 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-04-21 at 1.22.30 AM.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 489
Physics news on Phys.org
... the question is
"Why would a similar mechanism not be expected to play a part in the decomposition of long carbon chains..."
You replied:
my answer to this question would be that since the activation energy is lower than the bond energies, it is very easy to provide enough energy for the process to occur.

Off what you are really interested in:

It is unclear how much diversity is needed in the ability to form bonds with other elements for something other than carbon to end up as a basic building block for life ... but a carbon-poor environment would probably be needed for evolution to take that path.

A discussion of what counts as life and how it may form from different kinds of chemistry
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1367593104001358
... behind a paywall though.

At the other end of the scale:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_types_of_biochemistry#Silicon_biochemistry
... points out some of the difficulties.

The exercise you have just done shows you another difficulty.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top