Could Superluminal Light Speeds Impact Theories on the Universe's Cold Death?

  • Thread starter Thread starter multifaciatus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gain
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of superluminal light speeds on theories regarding the universe's potential cold death. Participants explore how cesium's state at near absolute zero could influence future conditions in an older universe, suggesting that more cesium might exist and could affect light transmission speeds. However, it is clarified that while phase velocity can exceed light speed in certain mediums, group velocity does not, thus not violating special relativity. The conversation raises questions about the feasibility of faster-than-light phenomena and their consequences for energy transmission in a dying universe. Ultimately, the implications of these findings for the universe's fate remain speculative and require further exploration.
multifaciatus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
What would the suggested effect from the results of this experiment on the predictions for the end of the universe, especially if it was a 'cold death'. The people doing the experiment mentioned that the state of cesium used existed at a near absolute zero temperature. In an older universe, wouldn't the temp be closer to that one and wouldn't there also be a lot more cesium in the future than currently exists? What would this mean that in the future transmission of light ( and other forms of energy) would be much faster than now? :rolleyes:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I believe you're talking about the experiments where signals were passed faster than light through a medium exhibiting anomalous dispersion.

The critical thing about this experiment is that while the phase velocity of the signal was faster than light, the group velocity was not. It did not violate special relativity. You cannot, in fact, transmit information faster than light.

- Warren
 
I don't think I was clear enough. I wasn't thinking about transmitting info. I was just thinking that towards the end of the universe, materials exhibiting anomalous dispersion would be passing around light peaks (phase velocity?) at speeds faster than light thru a vacuum, and i was trying to find something wrong w/ the idea besides significant absorbtion and perhaps the lack of free energy in the universe at that time. I was looking for the implications; if there are any.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
How does light maintain enough energy in the visible part of the spectrum for the naked eye to see in the night sky. Also, how did it start of in the visible frequency part of the spectrum. Was it, for example, photons being ejected at that frequency after high energy particle interaction. Or does the light become visible (spectrum) after hitting our atmosphere or space dust or something? EDIT: Actually I just thought. Maybe the EM starts off as very high energy (outside the visible...
Back
Top