Could Time Dilation be Caused by Increased Clock Energy?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between time dilation and clock energy, specifically questioning whether increased energy in a clock, whether kinetic or potential, could influence its ticking rate. Participants clarify that time dilation is a relativistic effect where moving clocks tick slower, and that the most accurate clocks are atomic, relying on stable oscillations, such as those in cesium atomic clocks, which operate at approximately 9 GHz. The consensus is that motion does not create clock-specific effects; rather, it is the relativistic nature of time that accounts for observed differences in clock rates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of time dilation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with atomic clock technology and operation
  • Basic knowledge of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Awareness of relativistic effects on time measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Einstein's theory of relativity and its implications on time measurement
  • Explore the workings of atomic clocks, particularly cesium atomic clocks
  • Investigate the effects of velocity on time perception and measurement in high-speed particles
  • Learn about the relationship between energy states and time dilation in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the mechanics of time measurement and the implications of relativistic physics on technology.

D.Hayward
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Im definitely not an expert in this field but i have a question. From what I've picked up time dilation can be observed when a clock has a velocity or moves away from the centre of Earth and it slows/speeds up. In both these cases the clock has more energy, be it potential or kinetic. Could this increase in energy cause the atomic clocks to speed up somehow? I know the increase in energy is small but so is the time dilation. This could be very wrong as i don't quite understand how these clocks work (a semi-simple explanation would be nice), but i feel like it would make sense if they speed up when they had more energy. I am probably wrong but i just want to know why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are suggesting that instead of time dilation, we're seeing errors on clocks due to motion, right? Well:

1. Your kinetic energy is always zero in your reference frame. So to you, there is no difference between being in motion and being stationary (or, rather, you are always stationary to yourself). So there can be no clock-specific effect of motion. If there were, we'd notice such effects in other phenomena when in motion (such as not being able to play catch on a moving train.
2. The most accurate clocks are not mechanical.
 
Clocks traveling fast usually tick slower actually. Some short lived particles can be seen for far longer than the normal lifetime of the particle when they are going fast through a particle accelerator. This can be explained by time dilation. So it is not just clocks but anything that moves in space also moves in time.. However small that might be.

In a clock you count a recurring phenomena like the swinging of a pendulum or the oscillations of something that happens periodically. If that oscillation is stable then you can call each oscillation one unit of time or a number of oscillations a unit of time. In an atomic clock the frequency is usually set by a transition between hyperfine states. In cesium this is around 9 ghz and this defines our second. This frequency is in the microwave region of the spectrum.
 
thanks guys that clears it up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 88 ·
3
Replies
88
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K