Couldn't understand the way the problem is solved regarding resistivit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ein Krieger
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the cross-sectional area and length of a wire during the process of wire drawing, where the volume of the wire remains constant. Reducing the cross-sectional area indeed increases the length of the wire, as the mass must remain constant according to the formula for mass (mass = density × volume). The confusion arises from the assumption that a reduction in area only affects the radius, while in reality, it also necessitates a proportional increase in length. The key takeaway is that as the cross-sectional area decreases, the length of the wire must increase to maintain a constant volume. Understanding this relationship clarifies the problem regarding resistivity and wire dimensions.
Ein Krieger
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was observing the solution of the following problem below:

765fa3055a66.png


Below it says that reducing the cross-sectional area of the wire triples its length. However, according to cross-sectional area equation A=pi*r^2 we observe that reduction of area only leads to reduction of radius .

Is there a mistake or I have some gaps in knowledge regarding above mentioned relationship?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It says the wire is drawn out to reduce it cross section area. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wire_drawing if you don't know what "wire drawing" means.

Assume the volume of the wire is constant. As you reduce the cross section area, you increase the length.
 
In the original configuration there is some fixed mass of wire. After stretching will there not be the same mass of wire? You need to make the wire longer to compensate for the loss in radius.

The wires mass before+
mass= ρ*Volume. the volume = A*L
so
Mass = ρAL

I will now let you find the length after stretching.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top