Coulomb Law and Vectors - How do you find a scalar answer from the vector form?

AI Thread Summary
Coulomb's Law can be applied to find the charge on two small metal spheres with equal charges, given their positions and the repulsive force they experience. The charge on each sphere is calculated to be approximately 2.8 x 10^-13 C by rearranging the force equation. The force should be expressed in terms of the absolute magnitude of the distance between the charges, rather than as a vector. The correct formula to use is F = k*q1*q2/r^2, emphasizing that it involves the product of the charges, not their sum. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving related problems in electrostatics.
bmarson123
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Coulomb Law and Vectors - How do you find a scalar answer from the vector form??

Two small metal spheres carry equal charges q. They are located at positions r1 = (1,1,0) nm and r2 = (0,0,0) nm and feel a repulsive force of magnitude (mod) F = 0.05 N

How much charge is on each sphere?

Write down the force on the charge at r2 in vector form.

What is the potential energy contained in this arrangement of charges?



Homework Equations


F21 = K q1q2 / r213 * r21


The Attempt at a Solution



First I thought I needed to convert everything into standard measurements, so metres.

But then when I put things into the equation I thought maybe stuff canceled out. But I figure I can't use F = 0.05N directly because in this equation F is a vector?

Anyway what I did was...

0.05 = K 2q / [(1,1,0) - (0,0,0)]3 * [(1,1,0) - (0,0,0)]

Then said that the vectors top and bottom cancel out so got...

0.05 = 2qk

which gave q = 2.8 x 10 -13 C

I didn't have a clue where to start with the rest of the question!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


F21 = K q1q2 / r213 * r21

The r21^3 in the denominator should really be |r21|^3: the cube of the absolute magnitude of the distance between the two charges. The equation would then give you the force exerted as a vector.

However, you don't really care about the direction of the force; all you know is the magnitude, which is 0.05N. So you should use F=kq1*q2/r^2, where r is just the distance between the two charges. Note that it's q1*q2, not q1+q2!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top