Coulomb's Law and electrostatic force

AI Thread Summary
To maximize the electrostatic force between two charged spheres, one must apply Coulomb's law, which describes the interaction between the charges. The charge on the first sphere is (Q-q) and on the second sphere is q. To find the optimal value of q/Q, differentiate the force expression with respect to q and set the derivative to zero. This process will yield the conditions for maximum force, despite initial confusion regarding minimum values. Understanding this differentiation is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
SAGHTD
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Of the charge 'Q' initially on a tiny sphere, a portion q is to be transferred to a second, nearby sphere. Both spheres can be treated as particles. For what value of q/Q will the electrostatic force between the two spheres be maximized?

The Attempt at a Solution


The theory in this topic is giving me a little problems. i just would like to know if I'm on the correct path of thinking and working the question out.

I understand electrostatic forces either repels or attractions. Now as the questions asked for the max value for the electrostatic. i think for the max value for electrostatic force between the two particles, the charge between the two spheres must have a even distribution of charge i guess. Like the charge on particle 1 could be +5 and charge on particle 2 is also +5 but what about the if the the charge on particle 1 is greater than that of particle 2 would the force be greater? am i doing this question correct or you have to use an equation of something??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SAGHTD said:
or you have to use an equation of something??

Yes, you have to use Coulomb's law, which expresses the mutual force of attraction (or repulsion) between two charges.

If the amount transferred to the second sphere is q, then the amount of charge left on the first sphere is (Q-q). So, use coulomb's law with Q1 = (Q-q) and Q2 = q.

You can then differentiate the expression w.r.t. q and set the result equal to zero to find the minimum.
 
cepheid said:
You can then differentiate the expression w.r.t. q and set the result equal to zero to find the minimum.

He needs maximum force not minimum! Minimum force will be at q=0.

But yes your method is correct. :approve:
 
cupid.callin said:
He needs maximum force not minimum! Minimum force will be at q=0.

But yes your method is correct. :approve:

Yeah, good catch. The wording is wrong. However, differentiating will naturally lead to a maximum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top