Coulomb's Law Can someone I don't understand how to do this.

  • Thread starter Thread starter ScottL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving Coulomb's Law and the forces acting on a charged particle. Participants are trying to determine the new positions of particles 1 and 3 to achieve specific rotations of the net electric force on particle 5. The principle of superposition is emphasized for calculating the net force on particle 5, which requires both magnitude and direction. One user has calculated the net force in the y-direction but is uncertain about the correctness of their approach. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in vector calculations and understanding the forces involved.
ScottL
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the figure 21-29, particles 2 and 4, of charge -e, are fixed in place on a y axis, at y2 = -7.20 cm and y4 = 16.6 cm. Particles 1 and 3, of charge -e, can be moved along the x axis. Particle 5, of charge +e, is fixed at the origin. Initially particle 1 is at x1 = -9.84 cm and particle 3 is at x3 = 9.84 cm. (a) To what x value must particle 1 be moved to rotate the direction of the net electric force net on particle 5 by 30.1o counterclockwise? (b) With particle 1 fixed at its new position, to what x value must you move particle 3 to rotate net back to its original position?

......|......
......|......
......4......
......|......
......|......
-------1------5-------3------
......|......
......|......
......2......
......|......


I tried to represent the picture that was provided as accurate as possible.
here is the actual picture that I was provided with.
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c21/fig21_38.gif



Homework Equations


Ok I know that I am supposed to use
FE = k(Qe*qp)/r2)
I can get the force that each one has on point 5 just by using the equation above but then I am stuck.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have not attempted the solution yet because I don't know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. I assume you have heard about the principle of superposition, i.e., that you can add up (vectorially) the force due to each of the charges on anyone given charge. Using this principle (and Coulomb's Law), first compute the direction of the net electric force on particle 5 when particle 1 is at its initial position. Note that force is a vector: so you will have to specify the direction of the net force (as well as its magnitude) when you state the answer. Once you have done this, more help will follow!
 
IPart said:
Okay. I assume you have heard about the principle of superposition, i.e., that you can add up (vectorially) the force due to each of the charges on anyone given charge. Using this principle (and Coulomb's Law), first compute the direction of the net electric force on particle 5 when particle 1 is at its initial position. Note that force is a vector: so you will have to specify the direction of the net force (as well as its magnitude) when you state the answer. Once you have done this, more help will follow!

Ok Since Fx net = 0 the only ones to take into account are the y directions.
I have come up with Fnet = -F52 + F54 = |3.622*10-26|

And the direction is towards the -y correct?
Or am I completely off base?
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top