Coulomb's law/Spring constant & Electric field problems

AI Thread Summary
A tiny sphere with a charge of +8.2 µC attached to a spring stretches 5.0 cm when influenced by two -4.0 µC spheres, leading to an initial miscalculation of the spring constant due to an incorrect distance. After correcting the distance to 0.0465 m, the spring constant was recalculated successfully. In the second problem, the electric field at point D due to two +0.95 nC charges was initially unclear, but the user eventually applied the correct approach using the equation for electric field strength. The final solution involved calculating the resultant electric field from both charges. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate distance measurements and unit conversions in solving physics problems.
Anthem26
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. A tiny sphere with a charge of q = +8.2 µC is attached to a spring. Two other tiny charged spheres, each with a charge of -4.0 µC, are placed in the positions shown in the figure, in which b = 4.2 cm. The spring stretches 5.0 cm from its previous equilibrium position toward the two spheres. Calculate the spring constant (diagram: http://imgur.com/FKcPp.gif ).

2.Two equal charges (Q = +0.95 nC) are situated at the diagonal corners A and B of a square of side x = 1.0 m as shown in the diagram. What is the magnitude of the electric field at point D (diagram: http://imgur.com/eervv.gif )?

Homework Equations


1. Coulomb's law:
F = Kq1q2/r^2

Spring Constant:
F = kx

2. Electric field:
E=kq/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


1. q1= 8.2*10^-6 q2= 4.0*10^-6 r= .027?? (I found this using Pythagorean theorem, but not sure if it's right.
So then, with that I plug it all in in coulumb's law and get 404.49N for one of the spheres and for my vertical component 404.49Nsin(65) (I got 65 from tantheta = .042/.02) = 366.59N
Because there's 2 of them I multiplied 366.59*2 = 733.18
733.19 = kx
733.19 = k(.05)
k= 14663 N/m But apparently that's not right.

2. I couldn't find a clear similar model for problem two, so this is all I have so far.
q= .95*10^-6 r= 1m
plug those variables into E=kq/r2 and I got 8540.5 N/C. I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to this, but I don't know where to go on from there.

*EDIT* ok I found what I did wrong with the first problem. I redid the whole problem and my 'r' was incorrect, it was supposed to be .0465m. After I got that, everything else was smooth sailing. Now all I need to do is learn how to do problem 2, which I have no clue. Hopefully someone could help me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ok I finally figured out the second question two, it took me a few attempts because I was confused with the SI units. I pretty much used this equation: sqrt (EA^2+EB^2)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top