Coulomb's law/Spring constant & Electric field problems

AI Thread Summary
A tiny sphere with a charge of +8.2 µC attached to a spring stretches 5.0 cm when influenced by two -4.0 µC spheres, leading to an initial miscalculation of the spring constant due to an incorrect distance. After correcting the distance to 0.0465 m, the spring constant was recalculated successfully. In the second problem, the electric field at point D due to two +0.95 nC charges was initially unclear, but the user eventually applied the correct approach using the equation for electric field strength. The final solution involved calculating the resultant electric field from both charges. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate distance measurements and unit conversions in solving physics problems.
Anthem26
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. A tiny sphere with a charge of q = +8.2 µC is attached to a spring. Two other tiny charged spheres, each with a charge of -4.0 µC, are placed in the positions shown in the figure, in which b = 4.2 cm. The spring stretches 5.0 cm from its previous equilibrium position toward the two spheres. Calculate the spring constant (diagram: http://imgur.com/FKcPp.gif ).

2.Two equal charges (Q = +0.95 nC) are situated at the diagonal corners A and B of a square of side x = 1.0 m as shown in the diagram. What is the magnitude of the electric field at point D (diagram: http://imgur.com/eervv.gif )?

Homework Equations


1. Coulomb's law:
F = Kq1q2/r^2

Spring Constant:
F = kx

2. Electric field:
E=kq/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


1. q1= 8.2*10^-6 q2= 4.0*10^-6 r= .027?? (I found this using Pythagorean theorem, but not sure if it's right.
So then, with that I plug it all in in coulumb's law and get 404.49N for one of the spheres and for my vertical component 404.49Nsin(65) (I got 65 from tantheta = .042/.02) = 366.59N
Because there's 2 of them I multiplied 366.59*2 = 733.18
733.19 = kx
733.19 = k(.05)
k= 14663 N/m But apparently that's not right.

2. I couldn't find a clear similar model for problem two, so this is all I have so far.
q= .95*10^-6 r= 1m
plug those variables into E=kq/r2 and I got 8540.5 N/C. I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to this, but I don't know where to go on from there.

*EDIT* ok I found what I did wrong with the first problem. I redid the whole problem and my 'r' was incorrect, it was supposed to be .0465m. After I got that, everything else was smooth sailing. Now all I need to do is learn how to do problem 2, which I have no clue. Hopefully someone could help me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ok I finally figured out the second question two, it took me a few attempts because I was confused with the SI units. I pretty much used this equation: sqrt (EA^2+EB^2)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top