Counterweights suspended or on rails

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raidzero
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the design considerations for a horizontal beam supported by vertical rubber conveyor belts, with counterweights involved. The main question is whether to position the counterweights on the opposite side of the beam or on a rail that restricts their movement to vertical only. The participant suggests that allowing counterweights to move freely simplifies the design, but expresses concern about sideways movement during deceleration due to the belt's elasticity. The consensus indicates that constraining the system to desired degrees of freedom is a sound engineering approach. Overall, the design choice hinges on balancing simplicity with stability during operation.
Raidzero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a question for mechanical engineers out there. While being one myself, I did not work in this field for 20 years, and I forgot all the formulas :)
The problem I have: a horizontal beam is attached to a pair of vertical rubber conveyor belts, one on each end of the beam. The beam has to move up and down. Since it's pretty heavy, there are some counterweights attached to the belts as well.
Now, the question is: would it be OK to use have the beam on one side of the belt and the counterweight hanging on the other side, or have the counterweight on a rail that only allows it to move up and down, and never sideways?
I believe that having the counterweights move freely, not on a rail, simplifies the design, the only concern is them moving sideways when the beam decelerates because of elasticity in the conveyor belt.
The beam has about 30 pounds and has to travel for about 8 feet. The two counterweights are about 15 pounds each.
Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There's no problem with constraining the system to only the degrees of freedom you desire. It makes good engineering sense to do so.
 
That's what I wanted to know, thank you very much.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top