Counting microstates in Boltzmanns principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the formula for counting microstates (W) in Boltzmann's principle when mixing ideal gases at constant volume and temperature. The formula W = ƩNi! / ∏Ni! is derived from the statistical behavior of particles, where Ni represents the number of particles of each component. The logic behind this counting involves recognizing that each particle can occupy various states, and the factorial terms account for the indistinguishability of identical particles. An example illustrates how the removal of a barrier allows gas molecules to choose between two volumes, leading to a calculation of microstates based on their positional choices. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding changes in microstates rather than absolute counts in the context of gas mixing.
erm
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Explain why the number of microstates W in Boltzmanns principle, is

W = ƩNi! / ∏Ni!

when i ideal gasses are mixed at constant volume and temperature. Ni is the number of particles of component i.


Homework Equations


S=klnW , where W is the number of microstates and k is Boltzmanns constant.

The Attempt at a Solution


What I am really asking here, is an explanation on how the microstates are counted. It is obviously the sum of all the factorials divided by the product of all the factorials of the different components. What is the logic behind this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's an example.

Suppose there is a container which is divided in two equal halves. In one half one mole gas is filled and the other half is completely evacuated. So, the gas will only remain in the first half.

Now the membrane separating the halves is removed. The effective volume is doubled. Now we can find the number of microstates that were introduced.

Each gas molecule has two choice, either remain in the first half or migrate to other half. Thus the total number of microstates we're seeing is just the capability of a molecule to choose where it wants to be. Thus it will amount to 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 ... upto NA or ##W=2^{N_A}##.

To check its validity, you can find out the entropy using Boltzmann formula AND using conventional formula considering reversible isothermal expansion.

As far as I am concerned, I don't think we can count absolute number of microstates. We can only count the change in their numbers brought about a process.
 
Thank you for the example. It expains how you can count the microstates in another case, but it really doesn't say anything about the problem I stated (mixing gases at constant volume and temperature). Could someone please explain this?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top