How High Does the Flowerpot Rise and How Long Must the Runner Accelerate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matthew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses two physics problems involving motion. The first problem involves a flowerpot that rises and falls past a window of height 1.77 meters, with the total time in sight being 1.0 second. The solution indicates that the pot rises to a height of 1.77 meters above the window. The second problem focuses on a runner who has 1100 meters left to complete a 10-km run in 30 minutes, needing to accelerate at 0.20 m/s². The calculation reveals that the runner must accelerate for 57.7 seconds to meet their goal time.
Matthew
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey can someone help me out with one or both of these questions?

1. A dog sees a flowerpot sail up and then back down a window (height of window is 1.77m). If the total time the pot is in sight for 1.0 s, find the height above the top of the window to which the pot rises.


2. A runner hopes to complete a 10-km run in 30.0 min. After exactly 27.0 min there is still 1100 m to go. The runner must then accelerate at 0.20 m/s^2 for how many seconds in order to exactly achieve his desired time?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's some clues for question 1:

This problem is a "two-parter" . The magnitudes of the velocities are the same as the pot passes the top of the window on the way up and one the way down. Ditto for the velocities at the bottom. THis means that you can cut the time given in half and solve for a single "free-fall" problem using displacement, time and acceleration as your known variables, and solve for the velocity at the top of the window. THen do the second part.
 
!

Sure, I'd be happy to help with your questions!

1. To find the height above the top of the window to which the pot rises, we can use the equation of motion for free fall: h = 1/2gt^2, where h is the height, g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2), and t is the time. In this case, we know that the total time the pot is in sight is 1.0 s, so we can plug that in for t. We also know that the height of the window is 1.77 m, so we can plug that in for h. This leaves us with the equation 1.77 = 1/2(9.8)(1.0)^2. Solving for the unknown height, we get h = 1.77 m. Therefore, the height above the top of the window to which the pot rises is 1.77 m.

2. To determine how long the runner needs to accelerate for, we can use the equation d = v0t + 1/2at^2, where d is the distance, v0 is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time. We know that the runner has 1100 m left to go, so we can plug that in for d. We also know that the runner has been running for 27.0 min (1620 s), so we can plug that in for t. The initial velocity is 0 since the runner starts from rest. We can then solve for a using the given acceleration of 0.20 m/s^2, which gives us a = 0.68 m/s^2. Finally, we can plug in all of these values to solve for t: 1100 = (0)(1620) + 1/2(0.68)(t)^2. Solving for t, we get t = 57.7 s. Therefore, the runner needs to accelerate for 57.7 seconds to achieve their desired time of 30.0 min.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top