Coupled damped harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling a coupled damped harmonic oscillator system, specifically focusing on the vertical and torsional displacements of a spring-mounted system. Participants explore the complexities of system identification, the effects of coupling between oscillations, and the challenges of validating models with experimental data.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Maria proposes a model for a coupled system of vertical and torsional oscillations, suggesting equations that include coupling coefficients.
  • Some participants suggest that the spring configuration may influence the coupling and the observed frequency peaks in the system.
  • There is a discussion about the physical meaning of certain frequency peaks detected in the frequency domain, with some participants considering them as noise while others see potential physical significance.
  • One participant raises the idea that the interaction of air flow with the system could also contribute to oscillations, drawing an analogy to vortex shedding effects.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of testing different joint methods to understand the coupling effects of the springs on the system's behavior.
  • Concerns are expressed about the complexity of solving differential equations for the system due to the number of springs and degrees of freedom involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the nature of the coupling and the factors contributing to the observed behavior of the system. There is no consensus on the best approach to model the coupling or the significance of the frequency peaks, indicating that multiple competing views remain.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their models and the need for further investigation into the physical parameters and configurations affecting the system. There are unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on specific definitions of the coupling coefficients.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for researchers and practitioners in mechanical engineering, system dynamics, and experimental physics, particularly those interested in coupled oscillatory systems and system identification techniques.

Krampus
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm dealing with system identification for the first time in my life and am in desperate need of help :) The system is spring-mounted and I'm analyzing the vertical and torsional displacements. However, it seems like the vertical and torsional oscillations are coupled (shouldn't be in theory..). So I want to create a model that takes this coupling into account. However this turned out to be much harder than I first thought...

The classical damped harmonic oscillator
x" + 2*gamma*x' + omega_0^2*x = 0 (1)

can be rewritten as:
x(t) = A*exp(-gamma*t)*cos(omega*t + phi) (2)
if omega_0^2 > gamma^2, (omega=sqrt(omega_0^2-gamma^2))

I'm supposing a coupled system between vertical and torsional oscillations would look something like this:
h" + 2*gamma*h' + omega_0^2*h + k1*a' + k2*a = 0 (3)
a" + 2*gamma*a' + omega_0^2*a + k3*h' + k4*h = 0 (4)

where k1, k2, k3 and k4 are coupling coeff.

But from here I have no idea how to continue... The main goal is of course to determine the coupling coeff and validating the model with experiment data. Does anyone have any suggestions of how to determine the coupling coeff? Or know how to express (3) and (4) as h(t) and a(t)? Furthermore I'm not sure that eqs (3) and (4) are the best to describe this coupled system... Any suggestions at this point are highly appreciated!

Thanks,
Maria
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What type of spring configuration is responsible for the motion? It seems to me you either need a model based on the geometry and properties of the actual device, or you need a statistical/numerical model that can extract a coupling factor from measured data.
 
The system is a sectional bridge deck model, similar to the one found here (figure 3):
http://www.ias.ac.in/jarch/sadhana/3/00000182.pdf"

I want to create a model based on measured data but with parameters that have physical meaning.

I've done vertical and torsional step responses. From the frequency domains it is easy to detect the natural frequencies but there are some other disturbing peeks that should not be there... Some of them I consider to be noise, but one (at least) is to big to be noise and I want to find some sort of physical meaning to it... To begin this investigation I wanted to see if there is coupling between the torsional and vertical oscillations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My background is EE but I've been doing some basic simulator work. It looks like there are four helical springs above and four below the deck.

First question, does a helical spring inject a torque on when it compresses? My intuition says it does unless there is decoupling provided at the joint of the spring with the deck. So in terms of physical models I'd look into that, then run a simulator with a simplified system to get some insight.

Sorry if I'm missing your point ...

Also another thought ... if the actual spring rates are poorly matched I wonder if the vertical displacements might then couple torsional oscilations, or something to that effect?
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your reply System Theory,

I think you have a point about the spring configuration causing disturbances in the frequency domain (I hope this was your point...). I've plans to improve the physical model by installing a joint where the springs are attached. I'm hoping that this will lessen or remove some peaks.

However, if there still are unignorable peaks left I might want to expand the model so that it includes them. Since my first post I have though realized that the equations I proposed for coupling are only capable of producing peaks at the natural frequencies (the disturbing ones I have are not at the natural frequency or a multiple of it...).

So what I would want to know (even if it proves to be unnecessary after my model improvements, it would still be interesting) is how, if there is some general equation for it, to describe this type of "coupled" system. With "coupled" I mean that there are frequency peaks other than the natural ones that are repeated in both the vertical and torsional the frequency domains. This shows that there is a clear dependence, but how to describe it?
 
If time and budget permit, I would first create a rig to measure the coupling or lack thereof of torque with compression or elongation of a single spring, using a rig that permits testing of different joint methods to the deck.

Next consider whether an imbalance in the linear spring characteristics or torque coupling characteristics creates an oscillation at some frequency (probably using the model for a single spring/joint combination in a computer simulator for rapid feedback).

In an electrical circuit analog springs are like inductors, mass is like a capacitor, and damping is like an lossy conductor, and when you put these elements in series/parallel configurations, the imbalances between actual device values become significant. So I'm assuming parameter imbalance may be causing a frequency in your noise signal ...

Personally my math skills would not permit a differential equation solution for eight springs in series/parallel with so many degrees of freedom and torsional coupling ... I'd end up chasing my tail in the math. DYNAST shell is one tool I use but I use it for much simpler systems than yours.
 
Last edited:
Another question, doesn't the flow of air past an object cause oscillations that could account for your results? For example, an open jacket on a motorcycle rider flaps up and down on each side at a natural frequency due to alternations in shedding a vortex. The back end of a big rig has a side to side (and perhaps torsional coupling) as the vortex sheds on one side, then the other, in a cyclic process, if I'm not mistaken. Hope that is useful as I don't know your exact problem ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K