Covariant and Contravariant Tensors

putongren
Messages
124
Reaction score
1
Not sure where to post this thread.

That being said, can someone explain to me simply what covariant and contravariant tensors are and how covariant and contravariant transformation works? My understanding of it from googling these two mathematical concepts is that when you change the basis of these two tensors, the scale of the resultant varies differently between the two. Please use simple to understand examples.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
putongren said:
That being said, can someone explain to me simply what covariant and contravariant tensors are and how covariant and contravariant transformation works?

We could begin with Cartesian tensors. In that context, do you understand how a change of coordinates applied to a column vector can be represented by multiplying the vector on the left by an invertible square matrix ?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top