Covariant Derivative Homework: Solve ∇_c ({∂}_b X^a)

MattRob
Messages
208
Reaction score
29

Homework Statement


Take the Covariant Derivative

∇_{c} ({∂}_b X^a)

Homework Equations



∇_{c} (X^a) = ∂_c X^a + Γ_{bc}^a X^b
∇_{c} (X^a_b) = ∂_c X^a_b + Γ_{dc}^a X^d_b - Γ^d_{bc} X^a_d

The Attempt at a Solution



Looking straight at
∇_{c} ({∂}_b X^a)
I'm seeing two indices. However, the b is nothing more than a reference to the derivative with respect to what, so I'm not sure whether this counts as a one or two-index object. Namely, do I solve it as

∇_{c} ({∂}_b X^a) = ∂_c {∂}_b X^a + Γ_{dc}^a {∂}_b X^d

since the index in the partial differential operator isn't the same as an index on a tensor, or is it?

So I'm thinking since the indices merely indicate you're working with a variety of objects (x^a = k => x^1 = k, x^2 = k, x^3 = k, ...), then the index on the differential operator should be treated the same, so I can treat {∂}_b X^a as a two-index tensor T^a_b = {∂}_b X^a

∇_{c} ({∂}_b X^a) = ∂_c {∂}_b X^a + Γ_{dc}^a {∂}_b X^d - Γ^d_{bc} {∂}_d X^a

So is it the latter case, former, or something else entirely?

I suppose I have every reason to think it should be the latter case, but I guess I'm just uncertain and want some clarification.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat it as a 2-index object.
 
  • Like
Likes MattRob
strangerep said:
Treat it as a 2-index object.
Second formula, then?

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top