Crab Nebula Pulsar: Angular Acceleration Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skomatth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulsar Rotating
AI Thread Summary
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam, with the Crab Nebula pulsar having a rotation period of T=0.033 seconds, increasing at a rate of 1.26 x 10^-5 seconds per year. The discussion revolves around calculating the pulsar's angular acceleration, questioning whether T(t)=2pi/w(t) is a valid approach. It is noted that the slow rate of change in the period means the angular speed remains nearly constant during one rotation. The emission of pulses from the magnetic poles may occasionally lead to receiving two pulses per revolution, but this is considered irrelevant to the main problem. Understanding the relationship between period and angular speed is crucial for solving the angular acceleration.
Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam the way a lighthouse emits a light beam. We receive a radio pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. The pulsar in the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T=.033s that is increasing at the rate of 1.26 x 10^-5 s/y

a)What is the pulsar's angular acceleration?
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ? If this is correct then I can get the answer, but even if it is correct I'm not sure why it works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't do the math. Just remember that the beams are emitted from the magnetic poles of the star, so you can expect that once in a while the orientation will be such that we receive two pulses per revolution. I don't know if any currently known ones are like that, though.
 
Judging by the context of the problem this is irrelevant.
 
Skomatth said:
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ?
Makes sense to me. Note that the rate of change of the period is so slow that for all practical purposes the angular speed hardly changes during one revolution.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top