Crab Nebula Pulsar: Angular Acceleration Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skomatth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulsar Rotating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the angular acceleration of a pulsar, specifically the one located in the Crab Nebula. Participants are examining the relationship between the period of rotation and angular velocity, particularly in the context of a pulsar whose rotation period is increasing over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the relationship between the rotation period and angular velocity, questioning whether the formula T(t)=2pi/w(t) is valid in this context. There is also discussion about the implications of the changing period on angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing insights into the relationship between the pulsar's rotation and its emitted pulses. There is an acknowledgment of the slow rate of change in the period, which may affect the angular speed during a single revolution. However, there is no explicit consensus on the approach to calculating angular acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the pulsar's emission pattern and its implications for understanding the timing of received pulses. There is also mention of the relevance of the changing period to the calculations being discussed.

Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
A pulsar is a rapidly rotating neutron star that emits a radio beam the way a lighthouse emits a light beam. We receive a radio pulse for each rotation of the star. The period T of rotation is found by measuring the time between pulses. The pulsar in the Crab nebula has a period of rotation of T=.033s that is increasing at the rate of 1.26 x 10^-5 s/y

a)What is the pulsar's angular acceleration?
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ? If this is correct then I can get the answer, but even if it is correct I'm not sure why it works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't do the math. Just remember that the beams are emitted from the magnetic poles of the star, so you can expect that once in a while the orientation will be such that we receive two pulses per revolution. I don't know if any currently known ones are like that, though.
 
Judging by the context of the problem this is irrelevant.
 
Skomatth said:
I know that T=2pi/w when omega is constant. Does it make sense to that that T(t)=2pi/w(t) ?
Makes sense to me. Note that the rate of change of the period is so slow that for all practical purposes the angular speed hardly changes during one revolution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K