Creating a number using a combination of two numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical puzzle regarding the highest number that cannot be formed by adding any combination of the numbers 4 and 9, with the answer identified as 23. The formula for determining this number, when two numbers have no greatest common factor (GCF), is expressed as N = XY - X - Y. Participants clarify the derivation of this formula and how to apply it to check if a specific number, such as 12345, can be represented as a combination of the two numbers. The conversation also touches on solving linear congruences to find integer solutions for the combinations. Overall, the thread provides insights into both the theoretical and practical aspects of the problem.
musicgold
Messages
303
Reaction score
19
Hi,

My question is related to the following puzzle.

“What is the highest number that can’t be created by adding any number of 4s and 9s”?
For example, 25 can be created as follows: 9 + 4 + 4 + 4 + 4 =25

I know that the answer is 23. I also know that the general solution to such a problem, using the numbers X and Y is (X*Y) – X – Y, when X and Y don’t have a GCF. If they have a GCF then, any number that is not divisible by the CGF can not be made using X and Y.

I have two questions.

Q1. How can I derive this formula from scratch : (X*Y) – X – Y ?

Q2. If I am given a number 12345 to figure if it can be created using X and Y, what is the quickest way to do that?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(X*Y)- X- Y is NOT a formula. A formula would be saying that is equal to something.

What you mean by "created using X and Y"?

Do you mean "find the largest number, N, that cannot be written in the form "XY- X- Y= N"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
(X*Y)- X- Y is NOT a formula. A formula would be saying that is equal to something.

What you mean by "created using X and Y"?

Do you mean "find the largest number, N, that cannot be written in the form "XY- X- Y= N"?

I believe the question statement is actually, "What is the largest number, N, that cannot be made out of additions of any number of X's and Y's?", and the OP states that the answer is given by N = XY - X - Y, when X and Y have no GCF.

The OP's first question is then, how does one derive that N = XY-X-Y?

The second question is, "Given a number M and numbers X and Y, how can one figure out how to write M = aX + bY, with a and b integers, assuming a solution exists?"

Is that interpretation correct, musicgold?
 
To solve for 12345, re-arrange your formula to

(AX-M)/Y=-B

In this form, iy's a Linear Congruence, so you can use the Modular Inverse
of X&Y to find A as follows:

A = invert(X,Y)*M (mod Y) = 1*12345%4 = 1

then solve fo B: (1*9-12345)/4=-B
-3084 = -B
B = 3084Be careful, though. You CAN actually solve f0r 23, but you get A=3,B=-1.
 
Mute said:
The OP's first question is then, how does one derive that N = XY-X-Y?

The second question is, "Given a number M and numbers X and Y, how can one figure out how to write M = aX + bY, with a and b integers, assuming a solution exists?"

Is that interpretation correct, musicgold?

That is correct. Thanks.
 
Oh, I forgot to mentio: if you don't like A=1, pick another.
In a linear congruence, if A is a solution, so is A+Y,
or A+nY, for that matter. So we can chose any A, as
long as it's a multiple of four plus one.

For instance, we can pick A=1001 and recalculate B
(B=834), giving us: 1001*9 +834*4=12345.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top