Creating LED Chaser Using 555 Timer and 4017 Decade Counters

  • Thread starter Thread starter unknown_2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counter
AI Thread Summary
Creating an LED chaser with a 555 timer and two 4017 decade counters involves connecting the carry output of the first chip to the clock input of the second. However, directly connecting outputs of digital chips is not advisable; instead, isolating them with diodes is recommended to prevent current backflow. While using two 4017s allows for controlling 20 LEDs, only two can be lit at a time, and a common resistor can be used to limit current. It's noted that a simpler setup with one 4017 can achieve similar results without the need for series diodes. The Knight Rider circuit is mentioned as a more complex alternative for special lighting effects.
unknown_2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
hey, I've been looking at ways to create a LED chaser using a 555 timer chip and 2 x 4017 decade counter chips(more than 10 LEDs). mind you I've only been working with these chips for an hour. so here's the dilemma, I'm not quite sure if I'm right on connecting the 2 chips. what i did was connect the carry output pin of the first chip to the clock pin of the second chip. then i connected one of the last output pins of the second chip to both reset pins of the decade counters. i have provided a schematic below. is this correct or am i missing something?

Schematic: http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b219/twiztedazn/SCHEMATIC1_PAGE1.jpg"

thanks,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
it's not a good idea to connect the output of these chips like that, however, you can isolate them with 20 switching diodes (10 for each chip). A diode will conduct current in one direction, so if one pin on, current will be blocked by the diode in the other pin, and vice versa. That way the current will guided only to the LEDs.

You can employ the same trick using one chip, but with less LEDs

555-KnightRiderAnim.gif
 
Your circuit should never have outputs connected together like that. This applies for almost any digital chip. Never connect outputs together.

With two 4017s you can turn on 20 LEDs but two at a time (One LED must be on for each 4017). The outputs just go to the LEDs and then through a common resistor to ground.
You do need a series resistor to limit the current, but since they are only coming on two at a time, it can be a common resistor.
Normally, you would have a resistor for each LED.

You do not need series diodes (in series with the LEDs) . That Knight Rider circuit had them because they were combining outputs to get special effects with the lights going backwards and forwards.
 
Last edited:
vk6kro said:
You do not need series diodes (in series with the LEDs) . That Knight Rider circuit had them because they were combining outputs to get special effects with the lights going backwards and forwards.

I think that's what he is trying to do.
 
Yes, I'm not sure.

It seemed like if he had two 4017s he wanted to have 20 lights coming on in sequence.

However, in the simple circuit, it was necessary to have one light of each 4017 on at a time and this could be achieved with one 4017 anyway.

The Knight Rider circuit is better, anyway.
 
Hey guys. I have a question related to electricity and alternating current. Say an alien fictional society developed electricity, and settled on a standard like 73V AC current at 46 Hz. How would appliances be designed, and what impact would the lower frequency and voltage have on transformers, wiring, TVs, computers, LEDs, motors, and heating, assuming the laws of physics and technology are the same as on Earth?
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Back
Top