Critical angle for a box to start moving on an incline

AI Thread Summary
To determine the critical angle (ø) at which a box begins to slide down an inclined ramp, the forces acting on the box must be analyzed. The gravitational force components along the ramp and perpendicular to it, along with the frictional force, are key to establishing the relationship. The equations derived show that at the critical angle, the frictional force equals the component of gravitational force down the ramp. This leads to the equation tan(ø) = µ, where µ is the coefficient of friction, resulting in ø = tan⁻¹(0.55), which calculates to approximately 29 degrees. Understanding the balance of forces at this angle clarifies the conditions for the box's movement.
Ethan_Tab
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A ramp with an angle given by ø (from the horizon) and a box of mass represented by "m" with a given µ=0.55 between the ramp and the box, find the minimum (critical) ø for which the box will begin to move down the ramp. Wether µ is kinetic or static is not given in the question.

Homework Equations


These equation are all in respect to the x and y axes being rotated such that they are lined up with the ramps surface
Fg=mg
Fgx=(sinø•mg)
Fgy=-(cosø•mg)
Fn=-(Fgy) which equals cosø•mg
Ff=µFn which equals 0.55(cosø•mg) and since we label down the ramp as +, Ff=-0.55(cosø•mg)

I think that is all we will need + some trig identities

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm really not to sure how to set this question up. Any and all help is much appreciated. If you could label all forces acting upon the box with the same terms that I have, that would be very helpful.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've listed a bunch of forces, but you need to structure them into single equations for the x and y components of the forces acting on the block.
\sum F_x
\sum F_y
Draw a force diagram and work out how they all sum together.
 
Cake said:
You've listed a bunch of forces, but you need to structure them into single equations for the x and y components of the forces acting on the block.
\sum F_x
\sum F_y
Draw a force diagram and work out how they all sum together.

Doing that I get:

∑Fx= Fgx+Ff
∑Fy=Fn+Fgy=0

Where do I go from here?
 
Ethan_Tab said:
Doing that I get:

∑Fx= Fgx+Ff
∑Fy=Fn+Fgy=0

Where do I go from here?
Think about your coordinate system you're using. Is the force of friction going in the same direction as the x-component of the gravitational force. And is the normal force in the same direction as the y-component of the gravitational force? Also it would help to put the forces in terms of values you know., such as mass and gravity.
 
Cake said:
Think about your coordinate system you're using. Is the force of friction going in the same direction as the x-component of the gravitational force. And is the normal force in the same direction as the y-component of the gravitational force? Also it would help to put the forces in terms of values you know., such as mass and gravity.

I am not actually given any mass, this is supposed to be a purely algebraic solution for the answer. With that being said, putting in values for g will be redundant. In terms of the coordinate system, if I plug in vector quantities I get
∑Fx=(sinø•mg)-0.55(cosø•mg)
∑Fy=cosø•mg-(cosø•mg)=0--- although the ∑Fy is useless at this point as we already have the Fn and thus the Ff as given above.

Would it also be important to make ∑Fx=ma, even though the question is not specifically asking for acceleration?
 
Ethan_Tab said:
I am not actually given any mass, this is supposed to be a purely algebraic solution for the answer. With that being said, putting in values for g will be redundant. In terms of the coordinate system, if I plug in vector quantities I get
∑Fx=(sinø•mg)-0.55(cosø•mg)
∑Fy=cosø•mg-(cosø•mg)=0--- although the ∑Fy is useless at this point as we already have the Fn and thus the Ff as given above.

Would it also be important to make ∑Fx=ma, even though the question is not specifically asking for acceleration?
At \theta_{max} Before the block slides what would the acceleration be in any direction?
 
Oh okay, I see what you're getting at. It would have to be 0 in the x and y directions as all forces will equal each other. From this we get:

∑Fx=0*m=0
0=(sinø•mg)-0.55(cosø•mg)
-(sinø•mg)=-0.55(cosø•mg)
now dividing both sides by mg we get
-sinø=-0.55cosø

Should I keep going and get a zero on either side? My problem with that is that if I bring either terms to the same side as the other term, I will have something along the lines of -sinø/-0.55cosø= 0, If the quotient of two trig ratios equals 0, what does that tell me? Also, at what point (if any) will we have to take the inverse sine/cosine. How will I know which inverse to take given that I have both cosine and sine.
 
Ethan_Tab said:
Oh okay, I see what you're getting at. It would have to be 0 in the x and y directions as all forces will equal each other. From this we get:

∑Fx=0*m=0
0=(sinø•mg)-0.55(cosø•mg)
-(sinø•mg)=-0.55(cosø•mg)
now dividing both sides by mg we get
-sinø=-0.55cosø

Should I keep going and get a zero on either side? My problem with that is that if I bring either terms to the same side as the other term, I will have something along the lines of -sinø/-0.55cosø= 0, If the quotient of two trig ratios equals 0, what does that tell me? Also, at what point (if any) will we have to take the inverse sine/cosine. How will I know which inverse to take given that I have both cosine and sine.
I would get rid of that negative sign too. So since we're thinking about the ratio of these forces, and their relationship with theta, how would you go about working with the y-component and combining the two equations?
 
Cake said:
I would get rid of that negative sign too. So since we're thinking about the ratio of these forces, and their relationship with theta, how would you go about working with the y-component and combining the two equations?

Im not sure if this is what you mean, but say you get to the point where you have sinø/0.55cosø=0, you could now break up sine and cosine into their ratios so:

[(opp/hyp)ø]/[(0.55adj)/(hyp)ø] in which case you could eliminate the hyp from both terms to get opp/0.55adj. Since the tan ratio is = opp/adj we could say that what we have there is = tan/0.55

Not sure if that's correct, but that's what I would do.
 
  • #10
You have:
sin(\theta)=0.55cos(\theta)
How would you get theta by itself from this? Think of getting theta into one term.
 
  • #11
Cake said:
You have:
sin(\theta)=0.55cos(\theta)
How would you get theta by itself from this? Think of getting theta into one term.

I'm not too sure, everything I've done eliminates the theta completely.
 
  • #12
If we get the coefficient of friction by itself we get:
\frac{sin(\theta)} {cos(\theta)}=0.55
What can you substitute for the ratio of sine and cosine of an angle?
 
  • #13
Cake said:
If we get the coefficient of friction by itself we get:
\frac{sin(\theta)} {cos(\theta)}=0.55
What can you substitute for the ratio of sine and cosine of an angle?

Oh okay, that makes sense, so then we could say:
sin(θ)/cos(θ)=0.55
[(opp/hyp)ø]/[(0.55adj)/(hyp)ø]
Which will cancel out the hyp's and we are left with
oppø/adjø=0.55

I am now inclined (no pun intend) to say that the tanø=0.55
and from there say that øcritical= tan-1(0.55)= aprox 29º which also happens to be the correct answer
but since there is a ø/ø, wouldn't we just have tan=0.55 which really doesn't tell us anything?
Essentially, why don't the ø's cancel out?
 
  • #14
The theta's don't cancel like a variable would. The sine and cosine aren't constants in front of theta, they're functions in themselves. Instead simply think of tan(\theta) as the ratio of sin(\theta) and cos(\theta).
 
  • Like
Likes Ethan_Tab
  • #15
Very interesting, this makes much more sense now. I think it was θmax and the fact that there won't be any acceleration at that point that really messed me up. Thanks for the help @Cake :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Cake
Back
Top