Criticize my proof (metric topology, Munkres)

mathmonkey
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let ##X## be a metric space with metric ##d##. Show that ##d: X \times X \mapsto \mathbb{R}## is continuous.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Please try to poke holes in my proof, and if it is correct, please let me know if there's any more efficient way to do it. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Here is my proof:

First, we show that for any fixed ##\textbf{x}##, the set ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)## defined as ##\{\textbf{y}|d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) > \epsilon\}## is open in ##X## under its metric topology. Suppose ##\textbf{y} \in A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)##. Then, consider ##B_d(\textbf{y},d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y})-\epsilon)##. We show that this open ball lies entirely in ##A(\textbf{x},\epsilon)##. Suppose ##\textbf{z} \in B_d(\textbf{y},d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y})-\epsilon)##. Then,
d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) \leq d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) + d(\textbf{y},\textbf{z}) < d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) + d(\textbf{x},\textbf{y}) - \epsilon
implies that ##d(\textbf{x},\textbf{z}) > \epsilon##, as desired.

Now we consider the general basis element ##(a,b)## of ##\mathbb{R}##. The set ##d^{-1}(a,b)## may be interpreted as the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## such that their distance is greater than ##a## but less than ##b##. Then, the set,
B = \bigcup _\textbf{x} B_d(\textbf{x}, b)
represents the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## whose distance is less than ##b##. Clearly, this set is open since it is an arbitrary union of open sets. Similarly,
A = \bigcup _\textbf{x} A(\textbf{x}, a)
represents the set of all ##(x,y) \in X \times X## whose distance is greater than ##a##. This set is open, as we have proven above. Then, ##d^{-1}(a,b) = A \cap B##, which is open in ##X \times X##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your proof is correct.Another approach for RxR concerns the metric inducing the topology on RXR.
See attached.
for general metric space use appropriate metric.see answer #3.
 

Attachments

  • 001.jpg
    001.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 479
Last edited:
metric for the producy topology
 

Attachments

There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top