Cross product in arbitrary field

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
Let \mathbb{F} be an arbitrary field, and let a,b\in\mathbb{F}^3 be vectors of the three dimensional vector space. How do you prove that if a\times b=0, then a and b are linearly dependent?

Consider the following attempt at a counter example: In \mathbb{R}^3

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\ 4 \\ 2 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \times\left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> 2 \\ 3 \\ 4 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> 10 \\ 0 \\ -5 \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

holds. Since 5 is a prime number, \mathbb{Z}_5 is a field. In (\mathbb{Z}_5)^3

<br /> \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> [ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> \times \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> [2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> [ 0] \\ [ 0] \\ [ 0] \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

This might look like a counter example to the claim. One might consider the possibility that perhaps the claim is true for example when \mathbb{F} is a subfield of \mathbb{C}, but not in general?

A closer look reveals that the counter example attempt does not work, because

<br /> [ 2] \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> [ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br /> = \left(\begin{array}{c}<br /> [ 2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\<br /> \end{array}\right)<br />

holds in (\mathbb{Z}_5)^3. Finding a counter example is difficult, and it seems that the claim is true after all. I only know how to prove the claim using determinants when \mathbb{F} is a subfield of \mathbb{C}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume that ##a## and ##b## are linearly independent in the field ##\mathbb{F}^3##, then you can expand them to a basis ##(c,a,b)##. Because of linear algebra, this means that the matrix formed by ##a##, ##b## and ##c## is invertible and thus has nonzero determinant. But this determinant is ##c\cdot (a\times b)##. Since this is nonzero, it implies that ##a\times b## must be nonzero.
 
  • Like
Likes Lebesgue
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
966
Back
Top