Cross product of complex vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the computation of the cross product of complex vectors, specifically whether it follows the same rules as with real vectors. The participants explore the standard definition of the cross product and question how complex components affect the outcome. There is uncertainty regarding the interpretation of unit vectors in the context of complex numbers. The conversation highlights a lack of clear answers in existing literature, suggesting that this topic requires further exploration. Overall, the cross product of complex vectors remains an ambiguous area in mathematics.
GabDX
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
How is computed the cross product of complex vectors?

Let ##\mathbf{a}## and ##\mathbf{b}## be two vectors, each having complex components.
$$\mathbf{a} = a_x \mathbf{\hat{x}} + a_y \mathbf{\hat{y}} + a_z \mathbf{\hat{z}}$$
$$\mathbf{b} = b_x \mathbf{\hat{x}} + b_y \mathbf{\hat{y}} + b_z \mathbf{\hat{z}}$$
For example, the ##x## component of ##\mathbf{a}## could be ##a_x=3+4i##.

I know that the dot product of ##\mathbf{a}## and ##\mathbf{b}## is
$$\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b} = a_x b_x^* + a_y b_y^* + a_z b_z^*$$
where ##^*## denotes the complex conjugate. Is there some similar trick that should be done with the cross product of complex vectors or is it the same as with real vectors? In other words, is the cross product given by
$$\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{b} = (a_y b_z - a_z b_y)\mathbf{\hat{x}}
+ (a_z b_x - a_x b_z)\mathbf{\hat{y}}
+ (a_x b_y - a_y b_x)\mathbf{\hat{z}}$$
or is it something different?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In such a vector definition, it is not clear what the unit vectors x-cap, y-cap, and z-cap would represent.

In standard complex variables, a complex function f(z) represents a mapping from the complex x,y plane to another complex u,v plane, in my understanding. Thus f(z) = f(x+iy) = u + iv.
 
This question has been raised before. Google "cross product complex vectors".
 
Raised but not answered!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top