A Cross sections of bins and combination

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Cross
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
suppose you have 2 bins each with cross section \sigma_1, \sigma_2...
if you combine those bins, is it a logical assumption to say that the cross section will also be added?
I suppose from the equality of the luminosity one can get:
\frac{1}{2}[ N_1 / \sigma_1 + N_2 /\sigma_2] = N_{1+2}/ \sigma_{1+2}
Obviously N_{1+2} = N_1 + N_2 (the entries of the 2 bins is equal to the sum of the entries of each bin)
However by that I obtain:
\frac{N_1}{\sigma_1} + \frac{N_2}{\sigma_2} =2 \frac{N_1 + N_2}{\sigma_{1+2}}
\sigma_{1+2} = \frac{2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 (N_1 + N_2)}{N_1 \sigma_2 + N_2 \sigma_1}

Isn't this result irrational?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two ratios N/σ should be the same, so you can simplify your expression.

If the cross sections in the bins are measured with different datasets, adding the numbers doesn't make sense, but adding cross sections still works. Just make sure they are not normalized to bin width.
 
  • Like
Likes ChrisVer
mfb said:
Just make sure they are not normalized to bin width.
Had some doubts with that too [in case the bin widths vary]... I wasn't going to take into account the widths...but generally speaking:
I don't understand how the cross section would come to get normalized to bin widths...You obtain it by integrating a histogram; so how would the bin width matter?
 
If your bin is from 20 to 30 GeV, and your cross section is 10 pb, then your cross-section is 1pb/GeV.
If your bin is from 20 to 30 GeV, and your cross section is given as 1pb/GeV, then your cross section is 10 pb
As easy as that. Cross sections can be added, cross sections per GeV cannot (directly).
 
obviously the one is the d \sigma /dx (in your example x=E) while the other is the \sigma. But OK I think I got what you wanted to pass.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top