- #106
Sorry!
- 418
- 0
mheslep said:There are no such laws protecting 'their' (Hadley) data. Some of the ground station is owned by other meteorology organizations and they don't want it freely released, they want to be able to charge for it. Frankly such data should either be bought up by governments and placed in the public domain, or otherwise considered unacceptable for scientific use.
Investigate all you want. All MM data is openly available on the web. And BTW, there'd by nothing scientific about such an investigation.
Well I was responding to Evo and I wanted to know her position and reasoning for it. She posted for some reason a part of one of the e-mails that included this:
That's where my post comes from. I wanted to know if this was what she was referring to by her post.We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind.
This is not a science forum so who cares if looking into the skeptics will be scientific, what's your point?