Crushing Multiple Cans: 8n Force Needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan32
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple
AI Thread Summary
Crushing multiple cans requires understanding the distribution of force across them. It takes 8N to crush a single can, and this force multiplies with the number of cans when stacked or aligned side by side. Crushing cans at an angle can facilitate easier buckling, but crushing multiple cans simultaneously is more efficient. Each column of cans will have its own 8N crush strength, meaning multiple columns will necessitate a proportional increase in force. Proper load distribution is crucial to ensure all cans are crushed effectively.
Dan32
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is possibly a very silly question, I am not experienced in this field.

I am creating a Can Crusher for a project.

If it takes 8n to crush a can. Will it still take 8n to crush multiple cans joined together end by end?
Also, if multiple cans were being crushed on a platform, against another platform. Let's say, 4 cans on the platform side by side, all vertical. Will it take 8n to crush all 4 cans side by side?

Thanks,
Dan.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Have you tried doing a free-body diagram of the forces on the cans in both configurations?
 
Dan32 said:
This is possibly a very silly question, I am not experienced in this field.

I am creating a Can Crusher for a project.

If it takes 8n to crush a can. Will it still take 8n to crush multiple cans joined together end by end?
Also, if multiple cans were being crushed on a platform, against another platform. Let's say, 4 cans on the platform side by side, all vertical. Will it take 8n to crush all 4 cans side by side?

Thanks,
Dan.

Tim's hint is good for your question. In addition, though, on a project optimization issue, are you just pushing down on the cans to crush them, or are you doing something else first to lower the force (significantly) needed to crush the can?
 
CanCrusher.png


Is this correct? So no matter how many rows or columns long, It will crush them all?

berkeman said:
are you just pushing down on the cans to crush them, or are you doing something else first to lower the force (significantly) needed to crush the can?

Originally, I designed it to crush the cans at an angle, to encourage the cans to buckle easier. However, It is much more efficient and easier to crush multiple cans at once.

Thanks for the help
 
Surely each column has the 8N crush strength, so multiple columns will require multiple times 8N to crush reliably. Obviously there could be uneven stacking, so one column is carrying the load for a bit, but once the load is shared, 8N will not do the job.
 
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top