Curious about the open system interconnect model

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model, particularly its layers and their relationship to hardware and software. The Data Link layer is identified as the primary layer that incorporates both hardware and software, while the model itself is described as a framework rather than a packaging mechanism for data. It provides a standard for manufacturers to create compatible networking devices without direct communication between companies. The OSI model is acknowledged as beneficial for establishing standards in IT, aiding in troubleshooting and organization of thoughts regarding network improvements. Although the OSI model is widely adopted in modern networking, it is noted that standalone computers not communicating with other nodes do not utilize the model. The discussion also touches on the challenges of developing non-OSI compliant protocols, emphasizing their potential incompatibility with existing market standards.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I'm curious about the open system interconnect model. I was wondering which layers of the OSI model are both hardware and software related? How does the OSI model package the data for transmission?
I don't believe that the OSI model is perfect, what do you think could improve it?

Do all computer platforms and OS use the OSI model?
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
I was wondering which layers of the OSI model are both hardware and software related?

I have never thought about it in that way. The Data Link layer incorporates both hardware and software. I do not believe any of the other layers do.

How does the OSI model package the data for transmission?

The OSI model doesn’t “package” anything. It is just a model, developed by the International Organization of Standardization, which gives manufactures a standard to go by when developing protocols and network hardware. The OSI model helps companies develop networking devices that are compatible with another companies’ products without the companies having to know or communicate with each other.

I have heard a lot of folks complain about the lack of standards in IT, so I do think the OSI model is definitely a good thing. I use it often in troubleshooting or thinking on how to improve something. It helps me organize my thoughts.

I don't believe that the OSI model is perfect, what do you think could improve it?

That question is way over my head. Many, many people, within huge originations developed this model. For me alone to quickly think on how to improve it would be egotistical of me.

Do all computer platforms and OS use the OSI model?

Nowadays they do (NICS and protocols that is, the OS has little to do with it). But if you have a stand alone computer that isn’t communicating with another node then the OSI model doesn’t come into play. When a computer transmits a packet through a NIC, seven layers of information are added to the packet. Each layer conforms to the OSI model and gives the recipient computer a set of instructions on what to do with the packet. The recipient computer receives the packets, strips off the layers while following the instructions embedded within the extra layers.

You could certainly develop a protocol that doesn’t conform to the OSI model. The problem is that it would be really hard to sell because it wouldn’t be compatible with anything out on the market today.
 
When data is transferred from one layer to the next, what actually happens to it? How does each layer effect he data that is being transfered?
 
UrbanXrisis said:
When data is transferred from one layer to the next, what actually happens to it? How does each layer effect he data that is being transfered?
Here is a link to a great tutorial on OSI. This should answer all of your questions. If not, let me know.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/introint.htm#xtocid5
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Urgent: Physically repair - or bypass - power button on Asus laptop'
Asus Vivobook S14 flip. The power button is wrecked. Unable to turn it on AT ALL. We can get into how and why it got wrecked later, but suffice to say a kitchen knife was involved: These buttons do want to NOT come off, not like other lappies, where they can snap in and out. And they sure don't go back on. So, in the absence of a longer-term solution that might involve a replacement, is there any way I can activate the power button, like with a paperclip or wire or something? It looks...
I came across a video regarding the use of AI/ML to work through complex datasets to determine complicated protein structures. It is a promising and beneficial use of AI/ML. AlphaFold - The Most Useful Thing AI Has Ever Done https://www.ebi.ac.uk/training/online/courses/alphafold/an-introductory-guide-to-its-strengths-and-limitations/what-is-alphafold/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaFold https://deepmind.google/about/ Edit/update: The AlphaFold article in Nature John Jumper...
Back
Top