Current Data for the world records most (efficient) Catalyst reaction

AI Thread Summary
Current discussions on the most efficient catalyst reactions highlight the complexity of measuring catalyst efficiency, which can be assessed through turnover frequency (TOF) and turnover number (TON). TOF indicates how many catalytic processes occur per unit time, while TON reflects how many times a catalyst can operate before degradation. Notable metal-based catalysts include ruthenium, achieving TONs in the millions, and rhodium, with TONs in the hundreds of thousands. TOF values for rhodium and gold catalysts can reach up to 400 TO/hr. However, enzymes are considered the most efficient catalysts, with theoretical TONs that far exceed those of metal catalysts due to their stability and adaptability in biological conditions. Enzymatic TOFs can be exceptionally high, with some reported at 4.2 TO/sec, equating to over 15,000 TO/hr. The discussion suggests that while metal catalysts are significant, enzymes may represent the pinnacle of catalytic efficiency, although further exploration in biological literature is needed for comprehensive insights.
Intuitive
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Does anybody have the current Data for the world records most (efficient) Catalyst reaction to date?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I don't know that anyone keeps track of this sort of thing...

There are different ways of measuring efficiency of a catalyst too though; you can look at turnover frequency (number of times the catalyst completes the catalytic process per unit time) or you can look at the turnover number (the number of times which the catalyst can complete the catalytic process before decomposition of the catalyst). One is a kinetic effect while the other is more of an overall ability of the catalyst. The best metal based catalysts I can think of are ruthenium based ones that can give TONs in the millions and rhodium catalysts which can give TONs in the hundreds of thousands. I rarely look at TOF numbers, but I have seen Rh and Au catalysts with TOF as high as 400 TO/hr.

The most efficient catalyst is probably an enzyme though. Enzymes are built to be stable for a long period of time under biological conditions so their theoretical TONs would be astronomical compared to metal catalysts. TOFs are probably better too, but that probably varies a lot too because some biological processes don't need a high TOF, but some others need a very, very high TOF. Some TOFs for enzymes are reported in TO/sec; I have seen as high as 4.2 TO/sec, which translates to over 15000 TO/hr.

There may very well be better ones out there, but I don't read much bio literature so I don't really know.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top