Current density of a moving conductor or conducting fluid

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of current density in moving conductors and its relationship with magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). It highlights the empirical form of Ohm's law, which states that current density is influenced by both the electric field and the magnetic force experienced by moving charges. There is confusion regarding the directionality of current density, as it does not necessarily align with the velocity of the conductor. The conversation also touches on the electromotive force (e.m.f.) generated by the interaction of a moving fluid and a magnetic field, questioning its derivation from Faraday's law. Overall, the complexities of current density in dynamic systems are emphasized, particularly in the context of MHD applications.
omyojj
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I beg you to understand my poor Eng..
If there is any poor grammar or spelling..please correct me..

While studying MHD with "An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics" written by Davidson,
I encountered the term 'current density'..
As you know well, empirically,
<br /> \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E}<br />
with electric field being measured in a frame of reference in which the charged test particle is at rest.

It says
This is an empirical law which, for stationary conductors, takes the form \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E}, where \mathbf{E} is the electric field and \mathbf{J} the current density. We interpret this as \mathbf{J} being proportional to the Coulomb force \mathbf{f} = q\mathbf{E} which acts on the free charge carriers, q being their charge. If, however, the conductor is moving in a magnetic field with velocity \mathbf{u}, the free charges will experience an additional force, q\mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} and Ohm's law becomes
\mathbf{J} = \sigma ( \mathbf{E} + \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} )

I can't understand this "empirical" Ohm's law for moving conductor(or conducting fluid) because, to my knowledge, \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r},t) = \rho_e(\mathbf{r},t)\mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r},t) is thought to be the more fundamental definition of current density. It is basically a vector having the (net) direction of charged particles drift velocity..
But \mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B} clearly does not coincide in direction with \mathbf{u}..

Also, I'd like to raise a question about the e.m.f. generated by a relative movemnet of the imposed magnetic field and the moving fluid. Why is it of order |\mathbf{u} \times \mathbf{B}|? Does it come from Faraday's law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I couldn't understand all your doubts

i will post some comments which may help

the current density vector <br /> \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r},t) <br />
need not be in the direction of u, it can be found in any direction. so u x B may not necessarily coincide with u.

may be in a wire the J is maximum in direction of u and it is of interest

the magnetic force component u x B is also responsible for genrating an emf. the equation used to arrive to this result should be faraday and maxwells equation.

i would like to read some material and give you a concrete explanation
 
In J = σ·E, σ is electrical conductance (ohm-m)-1.

In F = σ·V(E + v x B), σ is charge density (Coulombs per unit volume).

I think.

Bob S
 
suppose that the prescribed magnetic field \mathbf{B} = B_0 \hat{\mathbf{z}} is present..and suppose that ,at time t, at the origin of the inertial frame, a particle with charge q moves along the y-direction with velocity u..then the Lorentz force due to magnetic field is in the x-direction..and there is e.m.f generated around the origin..

then what is the current density at the origin at that time? is it not just q\mathbf{u}?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top