Current density of rotating spherical shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the current density of a rotating spherical shell with radius a and surface charge density sigma. The velocity of a point on the shell is expressed as v = a * Sin(theta) * omega, indicating that the current density has only a phi component. The current density is formulated as J_phi = (sigma) * a * Sin(theta) * omega * d(r' - a), utilizing the delta function to confine it to the shell's surface. Participants point out that restricting theta to the first quadrant is unnecessary, as the expression should apply to the entire shell. The conclusion affirms that the reasoning is valid when considering the whole spherical shell.
icelevistus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Express the current density of a spherical shell of radius a, rotating with angular velocity omega, with surface charge density sigma



Delta function will be denoted d(x). Spherical coordinates will be used



I have concluded that for a given chunk (if we restrict to the 0<theta<pi/2 domain), the velocity will be given by v=a*Sin(theta)*(omega). It is clear that the current density will only have a phi component. I have concluded:

J_phi = (sigma)*a*Sin(theta)*(omega)*d(r'-a)

Where the delta function is used to restrict the current density to the sphere's surface.

Can anyone confirm that this reasoning is correct?






 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks good, except I see no reason for you to restrict theta to 0&lt;\theta&lt;\frac{\pi}{2}...what is wrong with your expression for the lower half of the sphere?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
It looks good, except I see no reason for you to restrict theta to 0&lt;\theta&lt;\frac{\pi}{2}...what is wrong with your expression for the lower half of the sphere?

you're right, as I was writing it I thought I was using cosine and it would introduce a sign error. Whole shell it is!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top