Current flow on the surface of a permeability bigger than 1

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the behavior of surface currents in a spherical shell made of a material with magnetic permeability greater than one, surrounding a perfect conductor. It raises questions about the assumption that the surface current on the shell is zero, particularly in the context of static magnetic fields. The inquiry seeks to understand whether this assumption implies that the material cannot be a perfect conductor, suggesting it must have finite or no conductivity. The conversation emphasizes the nature of static problems, questioning the necessity of surface currents under these conditions. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the complexities of electromagnetic theory in relation to material properties and boundary conditions.
gau55
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi,
Quick description of the problem at hand: spherical perfect conductor around the origin with radius a, spherical shell (with radius b) around it made of a material with given magnetic permeability bigger than 1. Uniform Magnetic field in the area. The solution I am looking at (which I won't post as it isn't in english) uses the fact that the surface current on r=b, that is on the surface of the shell with permeability bigger than 1, is zero, as one of the boundary conditions for the solution. My question is why can we assume this ? why can there be no surface current on a material such as this ? Can we conclude definitively that it is not a perfect conductor ? if so we can say it either has finite conductivity or no conductivity, in both cases there can't be any surface current, but I couldn't justify the claim that this material is definitely not a perfect conductor. Am I even thinking in the right direction ?
thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should there be any current in a static problem?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top