Current on wire, three axes, magnetic force

AI Thread Summary
A 0.2-meter wire carrying a 30-ampere current in the +z direction is subjected to a magnetic field described by B = 2B_0i + 4B_0j + 3B_0k. The magnetic force on the wire is calculated using the formula F = IL X B, which involves the cross product of the current and the magnetic field. The initial calculation mistakenly included contributions from all components of the magnetic field, but only the orthogonal components should be considered. The correct approach requires using the right-hand rule or the determinant method to find the resultant force, which should yield a final answer of -24B_0i + 12B_0j. Understanding the cross product and its application is crucial for accurately determining the magnetic force on the wire.
scholio
Messages
159
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a 0.2 meter straight piece of wire has a current of 30 ampere flowing through it, pointing in the +z direction. the magnetic field presented in space is given by:

B = 2B_0i + 4B_0j + 3B_0k

what is the force on the wire?


Homework Equations



magnetic force on a current F = IL X B = ILBsin(theta)where X indicate cross product, I is current, L is length, B is magnetic field

The Attempt at a Solution



F = IL X B
F = ILB sin(theta)
F = (30)(0.2)(2B_0i + 4B_0j + 3B_0k) sin(90)
F = 12B_0i + 24B_0j + 18B_0k

i'm not sure sure whether i did the calculation correct, is the 30 amps only multiplied with the 3B_0k since the current points in the +z direction? i multiplied it through all, i,j,k.

will my final answer be presented in components of each axis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
couldn't edit original post, i am supposed to get -24B_0i + 12B_0j
 
You did the cross product wrong. If the length is in the z direction than z component from the magnetic field will die out in the cross product. The cross product is the multiplication of orthogonal (perpendicular) components, so physically you should not see things going in the same direction contribute.

Do you know of the component-wise way of doing cross products? If you don't know the determinate trick, then you can just use the right hand rule and figure it out.
 
the determinant trick involves matrices correct? i think i know how to do that, could you explain the right hand rule a little more, having a little trouble visualizing.
 
Okay so with the determinate trick you would have something like this

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/Mathematics/geomath/level2/mat/mat121.html

For the right hand rule you want to point your fingers in the direction of the first vector, and then curl them in the direction of the second vector. Your thumb would show you the direction of the resultant vector. For example, x cross y should show you z; or, z cross y should show -x.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top