Curvature of spacetime inside hollow sphere

Tony Stark
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
If mass curves spacetime in its vicinity, then consider the following case-
Take a heavy hollow lead sphere which has 2 smaller lead balls placed in it. The Outer Sphere will curve spacetime around itself and thus will have its own gravity, but what about the 2 balls placed in it? The spacetime already have been curved by the outer sphere, then how will the two smaller balls have their own gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tony Stark said:
The spacetime already have been curved by the outer sphere, then how will the two smaller balls have their own gravity?
Space time geometry inside the big shell with the smaller balls is different than without them.
 
A.T. said:
Space time geometry inside the big shell with the smaller balls is different than without them.

Outside too, of course. (A.T. already knows this, I'm just not sure that OP does).
 
A.T. said:
Space time geometry inside the big shell with the smaller balls is different than without them.
The geometry of spacetime is taken invariant in General Relativity, so how can it be different..
 
Tony Stark said:
The geometry of spacetime is taken invariant in General Relativity
Where did you get that idea from?
 
Tony Stark said:
The geometry of spacetime is taken invariant in General Relativity

"Invariant" means "the same for all observers" (or in all frames of reference). It does not mean "the same for all possible distributions of matter and energy". If you change the distribution of matter and energy (for example, by putting two smaller lead balls inside a hollow lead sphere, instead of just having the hollow lead sphere with nothing inside it), you change the geometry of spacetime.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top