Curve Sketching using derivatives

  • Thread starter Thread starter preet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Derivatives
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on understanding vertical, horizontal, and oblique asymptotes in rational functions using derivatives. The key methods involve checking the degrees of the numerator and denominator: for horizontal asymptotes, the degree of the denominator must be greater than or equal to that of the numerator, while for oblique asymptotes, the numerator's degree must exceed that of the denominator. The process includes dividing by the highest order term and evaluating limits as x approaches infinity to determine the behavior of the function at extreme values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational functions and their components
  • Knowledge of limits and their evaluation
  • Familiarity with polynomial degrees and their implications
  • Basic skills in performing polynomial long division
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of limits in calculus, focusing on L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Learn about polynomial long division and its application in finding asymptotes
  • Explore examples of rational functions with varying degrees to solidify understanding of asymptotic behavior
  • Investigate the graphical representation of asymptotes and their significance in curve sketching
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on function analysis, and anyone interested in mastering curve sketching techniques using derivatives.

preet
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
When you're looking for vertical asymptotes in the graph of a rational function, you check to see whether or not the denominator has any values of x that could make it zero. I don't have any problems understanding this, or visualizing it.

However, when you check for horizontal or oblique asymptotes, I don't understand the logic of either method. This is the way I've learned to do it...

For a horizontal asymptote [first check to see if the function has one, the denominator must have a greater to or equal order exponent from the numerator] divide by the highest order term and evaluate the limit as x -> infinity.

For an oblique asymptote [first check to see if the function has one, the numerator must be higher order than the denominator] divide the numerator by the denominator and evaluate the lim as x -> infinity.

For horizontal asymptotes, I understand the part about evaluating the limit... the expected value for the limit will be what y approaches but never touches. But I don't understand how the 'check' works or why you divide by the highest order term before evaluating the limit as x-> infinity.

The same goes for oblique asymptotes. I would think that when you just evaluate the rational function for x-> infinity, you would get a linear equation that tells you what y is approaching... again, I don't understand how the check works, or why you divide the numerator by the denominator... can someone explain?

Thanks in advance
Preet
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Preet said:
For horizontal asymptotes, I understand the part about evaluating the limit... the expected value for the limit will be what y approaches but never touches. But I don't understand how the 'check' works or why you divide by the highest order term before evaluating the limit as x-> infinity.
xn, as x goes to infinity, for n> 0, is undefined. On the other hand, x-n, as n goes to infinity, is 0 and a lot easier to handle. That's why you divide each term, in both numerator and denominator, by the highest power of x: to get as many negative powers as you can.

Preet said:
The same goes for oblique asymptotes. I would think that when you just evaluate the rational function for x-> infinity, you would get a linear equation that tells you what y is approaching... again, I don't understand how the check works, or why you divide the numerator by the denominator... can someone explain?
A fractions is a division! P(x)/Q(x) means "P(x) divided by Q(x)". Obviously, if the degree of the denominator, Q, is greater than that of P, then the fraction goes to 0 as x goes to infinity and so y= 0 is a horizontal asymptote. If degree of Q is greater than or equal to degree of P, then P(x)/Q(x)= A(x)+ B(x)/C(x) where, again, degree of C is greater than degree of B (A(x) is the "quotient", B(x) is the "remainder" when you divide). Now, as x goes to infinity, B(x)/C(x) goes to 0 leaving A(x) as the asymptote. By the way, that is NOT necessarily linear. If degree of Q is equal to the degree of P, then A(x) is a constant and there is a horizontal, y not equal to 0, asymptote. If the degree of Q is exactly one more than the degree of P, then A(x) is linear and there is a linear, oblique, asymptote. If degree of the Q is 2 or more greater than the degree of P, then A(x) is a polynomial of degree 2 or more and there is a "curved" asymptote. You've probably only seen examples of straight line asymptotes.
 
If y=h(x) is a slant asymptote of f(x), then we must have

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (f(x)-h(x))=0[/tex]

suppose that f(x) is a rational function such that the degree of the numerator is higher than that of the denominator [i.e. degree(P)>=degree(Q) ], then we have

[tex]f(x):=\frac{P(x)}{Q(x)}= g(x)+\frac{R(x)}{Q(x)}[/tex]

where the latter representation is obtained by long division, g(x) denotes the quotient and R(x) denotes the remainder which is such that degree(R)<degree(Q), so that

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} \frac{R(x)}{Q(x)}=0[/tex]

now we have

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow \infty} (f(x)-h(x)) = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\left( g(x)+\frac{R(x)}{Q(x)} -h(x)\right) = \lim_{x\rightarrow \infty}\left( g(x)-h(x)\right) = 0[/tex]

so clearly if if we take the quotient g(x) to be the slant asymptote h(x) it will work, that is the above limit will indeed be zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K