Cyclic Normal Groups: Proving Normality of Subgroups in Cyclic Groups"

math8
Messages
143
Reaction score
0
Let H be normal in G, H cyclic. Show any subgroup K of H is normal in G.

I was thinking about using the fact that subgroups of cyclic groups are cyclic, and that subgroups of cyclic groups are (fully)Characteristic (is that true?). Then we would have
K char in H and H normal in G.
Hence K normal in G.

I am not sure about the part where subgroups of cyclic groups are characteristic. If yes, How would you prove this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think concretely. A cyclic group is isomorphic to either the integers Z, or the integers mod n, Z_n. Can you prove any subgroup of those is characteristic?
 
I am thinking maybe that since cyclic groups of a certain order are unique up to isomorphism and that if a subgroup K of a certain order is unique in a group H, then K char in G.

Now since K is cyclic in H, then K char in H.
 
math8 said:
I am thinking maybe that since cyclic groups of a certain order are unique up to isomorphism and that if a subgroup K of a certain order is unique in a group H, then K char in G.

Now since K is cyclic in H, then K char in H.

Something like that. If you can prove there is exactly one subgroup of a given order in Z_n then you've got it. In the infinite case of Z, it's not going to be useful to consider order though.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top