Cyclotron Resonance: Lower Limit for Electron Scattering Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt atkinson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclotron Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the lower limit of electron scattering time necessary to observe cyclotron resonance in a material under a magnetic field of 1 T, with an effective electron mass of 0.06 times the free electron mass. The user initially calculated the scattering time as 2.14 ps but found a discrepancy with the expected answer of 0.54 ps, noting a difference of a factor of 4. This factor arises from the consideration that only a quarter of a cycle is needed for sufficient observation, as some electrons may not scatter during this time. The conversation highlights that while there is no absolute limit on scattering time, shorter times complicate observations. The clarification on the factor of 4 resolves the user's confusion regarding the differing results.
Matt atkinson
Messages
114
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Calculate the lower limit of the electron scattering time in a material placed in a magnetic field of 1 T which is necessary to observe cyclotron resonance. The electron effective mass in the material
is 0.06 ##m_o## (where ##m_o## is the free electron mass).

Homework Equations


##\omega_c=\frac{eB}{0.06m_o}##
##\tau_{min}=\frac{2\pi}{\omega_c}##

The Attempt at a Solution


So I basically substituted values into ##\omega_c## and then into the equation for ##\tau_c## i got ##\tau_c=2.14ps## whereas the answer says ##\tau_c=0.54ps##, have I gone wrong? or is the solution given wrong, because i have done it multiple times.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two answers differ by a factor of 4 (+-2%). I guess they took 1/4 of a cycle to be sufficient (some electrons won't scatter for 4 times the scattering time). There is no absolute limit, a shorter time just makes observations harder.
 
ah okay! Thankyou very much I did notice the factor of 4 difference just wasn't sure where it came from.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top