Cygnus X1: Date of Highest Excursion

  • Thread starter Thread starter sscran
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cygnus X-1, located at right ascension 19h38m and declination 34.6°, remains consistently above the celestial equator due to its high declination. Its apparent motion is minimal, taking thousands to millions of years to change significantly. The equivalent of a solstice for Cygnus X-1 occurs when it reaches its highest point in the sky, which is around July 21 at midnight. This is based on its right ascension, as stars with an RA of 12 hours transit at midnight on the spring equinox. Currently, Cygnus X-1 is visible in the west shortly after sunset.
sscran
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello forum users.

I am a composer that knows sadly very little about astronomy. For a piece, I have been doing some research, and I want to find out either the date that cygnus x1 reaches its highest excursion relative to the celestial equator, or how I might be able to calculate such by myself. If it helps, its coordinates on the celestial sphere are: right ascension 19h38m and declination 34.6°
Thanks in advance.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
sscran said:
Hello forum users.

I am a composer that knows sadly very little about astronomy. For a piece, I have been doing some research, and I want to find out either the date that cygnus x1 reaches its highest excursion relative to the celestial equator, or how I might be able to calculate such by myself. If it helps, its coordinates on the celestial sphere are: right ascension 19h38m and declination 34.6°
Thanks in advance.

Your question is not clear. It's declination of 34.6° means that it is 34.6° above the celestial equator and will stay there for a long time. It is 6000 light-years away, so its movement on the celestial sphere is very small, on the order of milli-arc-seconds per year. So it will take thousands to millions of years to move significantly. Are you asking about its motion on those time scales, or asking about the precession of the celestial equator due to the precession of the Earth's axis (which takes 26,000 years to make a full circle), or something else?
 
thanks so much for your quick response. Maybe I did a poor job of framing it, but what I really meant is- what might be the equivalent of a solstice be for cygnus x1. We see constellations drift with the seasons, so for cygnus x1, is there a predictable date at which it will appear most northerly? If so, what is that date, or how might I be able to deteremine it. Thanks so much.
 
sscran said:
thanks so much for your quick response. Maybe I did a poor job of framing it, but what I really meant is- what might be the equivalent of a solstice be for cygnus x1. We see constellations drift with the seasons, so for cygnus x1, is there a predictable date at which it will appear most northerly? If so, what is that date, or how might I be able to deteremine it. Thanks so much.

OK, I see your question. That depends on its right ascension, which is about 20 hours. A right ascension of 12 hours will be highest in the sky (we say transiting) at midnight on the spring equinox, about Mar 21, and the stars progress at about 4 minutes/day, or about 2 hours of RA/month. So an RA of 20 hours will be highest in the sky at midnight on about July 21. It's in the constellation Cygnus, which is high in the sky during the summer for northern hemisphere observers. This time of year it will transit around around 4 PM and should be visible in the west soon after sunset. Is this your question?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top