Cylindrical Capacitor Computation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of cylindrical capacitors, particularly focusing on the implications of the capacitor's geometry, specifically when the length (L) is less than or equal to the outer radius (b). Participants explore the differences in equations for air-filled versus dielectric-filled capacitors and raise questions about the validity of certain equations in different contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what happens to the computation when L is less than or equal to b, suggesting that the geometry may affect the calculations.
  • One participant asserts that the first equation for a cylindrical capacitor is correct for air-filled capacitors and provides the equation for a dielectric-filled cylindrical capacitor, including constants and variables.
  • Another participant notes that the dielectric constant of myelin varies according to different authors and mentions a specific range of values.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of increasing b toward L, with one participant suggesting that if L is less than b, L could be replaced with b in calculations.
  • Some participants discuss the relationship between capacitance, signal velocity, and amplitude in the context of nerve signals, indicating that lower capacitance is preferable for high amplitude and faster signals.
  • One participant mentions using simulation software to analyze signal dampening and questions the relationship between cut-off frequency and signal velocity.
  • Gauss' law is referenced in relation to calculating the electric field for an infinite cylinder, with a note that L must be much greater than b for the calculations to hold.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the geometry of the capacitor on computations, with no consensus reached on how to handle cases where L is less than or equal to b. There are also varying opinions on the relevance of certain equations and the dielectric constants discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the assumptions made in the equations, particularly concerning the dielectric constants and the conditions under which the equations are valid. The discussion also highlights the complexity of the relationship between capacitance and signal transmission in biological contexts.

Engineering news on Phys.org
The first equation for a cylindrical capacitor is correct, and is written for an air-filled capacitor (no dielectric).

the equation for a dielectric-filled cylindrical capacitor is

C = 2 pi ek e0 L / Ln(b/a) Farads

where ek == dielectric constant of membrane (unitless)
e0 == 8.85 x 10-12 Farads per meter
L == length of capacitor in meters
Ln(x) == natural log of x
b, a == outer and inner radii in meters
=======Homework=====
Check consistency of all units in above equation
Look up the dielectric constant of mylar (DuPont)
Compare to dielectric constant of a myelinated nerve
Look up the description of multiple sclerosis
Look up the definition and description of demyelination
 
Last edited:
Bob S said:
=======Homework=====
Check consistency of all units in above equation
Look up the dielectric constant of mylar (DuPont)
Compare to dielectric constant of a myelinated nerve
Look up the description of multiple myeloma
Look up the definition and description of demyelination

The two last homework lines aren't necessary at all since I'm a health professional. :wink:
I understand the first one and may compare the two dielectric constants but myelinated/unmyelinated dielectric vary with authors.

What happens when b grows toward the value of L?

Edit: I found a dielectric value for myelin around 6 to 10.
 
Last edited:
somasimple said:
What happens when b grows toward the value of L?

Edit: I found a dielectric value for myelin around 6 to 10.
RE What happens when b grows toward L? This is a difficult 3-D problem, so I looked in my favorite E&M book (Smythe) but could not find a good answer. My suggestion is if L< b then replace L with b.

I will make a few comments about signal transmission lines and capacitance, and I will try to make them applicable to nerve signals. There are two basic types of analog transmission lines (delay lines) used by engineers: The L - C transmission line (usually dispersionless) and the R - C delay line (usually dispersive). In both types, the signals travel through the series components; L (inductance), or R (resistance), or axons or schwann cells. In all types the capacitance C is between the center conductor (axon or schwann cells) and the outer ground conductor, separated by a space between a and b (insulating dielectric or myalin sheath).

The signal velocity along the center conductor (along axons) is proportional to 1/sqrt(LC) or 1/(RC), and the signal amplitude (voltage or spikes) is proportional to sqrt(L/C) or (1/C). For high amplitude signals and for faster signals, a low capacitance is better. The capacitance for a given geometry (given a, b, L) is proportional to the dielectric constant: Air = 1. mylar (duPont sheets) = 3.2, myelin sheath around axon = 6 to 10, and water = 80. So to preserve both fast nerve signals and high amplitude signals (for given a, b, and L), air is best, followed by mylar, myelin sheath, and water (worst). For a given L and a, larger b is better (but scales only as Ln (a/b))
I hope this helps.
 
somasimple said:
What happens when L is <= b? Does the computation change?
The electric field was calculated by applying Gauss' law to an infinite cylinder. Which is why L must be >> than b.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capcyl.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bob S said:
The signal velocity along the center conductor (along axons) is proportional to 1/sqrt(LC) or 1/(RC), and the signal amplitude (voltage or spikes) is proportional to sqrt(L/C) or (1/C). For high amplitude signals and for faster signals, a low capacitance is better. The capacitance for a given geometry (given a, b, L) is proportional to the dielectric constant: Air = 1. mylar (duPont sheets) = 3.2, myelin sheath around axon = 6 to 10, and water = 80. So to preserve both fast nerve signals and high amplitude signals (for given a, b, and L), air is best, followed by mylar, myelin sheath, and water (worst). For a given L and a, larger b is better (but scales only as Ln (a/b))
I hope this helps.

Thanks Bob but I simulated the lines with Micro Cap 9 (http://www.spectrum-soft.com/index.shtm" ) and I found effectively the same values of a signal dampening. There is a low pass filtering and, of course, a lower capacitance helps to enhance the cut-off frequency of the filter. But enhancing the limit of the filter doesn't give any mean to enhance the velocity of a signal, I think?
Secondly, the cut-off frequencies are around 10/50 Hz and the the mean sinusoidal frequency (first harmonic) of a firing neuron is often > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_potential#Taxonomic_distribution_and_evolutionary_advantages" but it is very well transmitted. It's a kind of huge contradiction.

dlgoff said:
The electric field was calculated by applying Gauss' law to an infinite cylinder. Which is why L must be >> than b.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capcyl.html"
That's why I asked
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K