Cylindrical fishing reel problem using moment of inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a cylindrical fishing reel, focusing on calculating the force exerted by a fish and the length of line unwound over time. The moment of inertia was initially miscalculated, leading to confusion about relating torque to it. The correct moment of inertia is determined to be 8.6 x 10^-4 kg·m², and the relationship between torque and angular acceleration is clarified. The importance of using radians for angular displacement in calculations is emphasized for accurate results. The participant expresses gratitude for the guidance received, indicating a resolution to their confusion.
jhart_929
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cylindrical fishing reel has a mass of 0.85 kg and a radius of 4.5 cm. A friction clutch in the reel exerts a restraining torque of 1.6 N·m if a fish pulls on the line. The fisherman gets a bite, and the reel begins to spin with an angular acceleration of 66 rad/s2.
a) Find the force of the fish on the line.
b) Find the amount of line that unwinds in .5 seconds.


Homework Equations


I = .5mr^2
theta = .5at^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the moment of inertia to be 8.606. What I don't understand is how to relate the torque to the moment of inertia. I don't know if my calculator should be set to radians or degrees, but I tried both ways and got them both wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all I needs to be calculated with the radius as .045. That makes your I off by a factor of 104

I = 8.6*10-4

T = a*I

So accounting for the force on the line and the restraining force ...

F*.045 = 1.6 + 66*8.6*10-4

You have the right equation for b. Just remember that since θ is in radians, you need to provide θ*r for the length of line that reels off.
 
Alright thanks so much! I understand how to do it now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top