Is D+D Nuclear Fusion Possible in the Next 50-60 Years?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of D+D nuclear fusion within the next 50 to 60 years. Despite the Z machine achieving temperatures exceeding 2 billion degrees Fahrenheit, doubts persist regarding the ability to generate sufficient energy and pressure for a self-sustaining D+D fusion reaction within the next century. Cold fusion claims are also addressed, with current evidence deemed weak and anomalies likely attributed to contamination or measurement errors. The conversation suggests that speculation on this topic is unproductive, recommending a search for peer-reviewed papers in respected physics journals for more reliable information. The mention of a hot fusion aspect of the D+D reaction indicates a need for further clarification, while the overall sentiment leans towards the discussion being more suitable for specialized forums in nuclear engineering or physics.
Lamented_Soul
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Do you think D+D Nuclear Fusion will be possible within the next 50 or 60 years? Although the Z machine reportedly reached temperatures of over 2,000,000,000 Degrees (F), I doubt we will be able to output enough energy and pressure to make a self-sustaining D+D fusion reaction anytime within the next 100 years.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the latest information that I have in the napster regarding the cold fusion claims. I know there was something about this during the last year or so, but it seems that I don't have a link handy at the moment. My best reading so far is that there are observed anomalies, but any evidence for cold fusion is weak at best. More likely the anomalies are the result of other factors such as contamination and measurement errors.
http://meetings.aps.org/Meeting/MAR05/SessionIndex/55/?SessionEventID=28515

Speculation about something like this is pointless so I am locking the thread. I would do a search at google scholar for related papers published in respected physics journals, in order to get an overview of the latest information.
 
It has been brought to my attention that there is a hot fusion side of the D+D reaction. My mistake, but still too speculative for S&D as posted. A discussion about the state of the technology would be appropriate for the nuclear engineering or physics forums.

My time in the forums has been extremely limited of late an apparently I didn't even read the op. Sorry about that.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top