Dalton's law of partial pressures equivalent to volume ratio?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Dalton's law of partial pressures and volume ratios in ideal gas mixtures. It questions the validity of using the volume ratio to determine partial pressures, suggesting that Pi can be expressed as a function of volume instead of the standard mole fraction approach. The conversation explores how the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) applies to this context, particularly in binary solutions. Participants analyze the implications of summing partial pressures and volumes, leading to insights about the equivalence of these methods under certain conditions. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the derivation and application of these principles in physical chemistry.
Syrus
Messages
213
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I had a general inquiry about a relation in my physical chemistry textbook. It stated that when determining the partial pressure of an ideal gas component in a mixture/solution, instead of using the standard Dalton's law: Pi = xiPtot, one can simply use the relation Pi = (volume i : volume mixture or solution)Ptot.

I am having a hard time convincing myself of this and have not been able to find a derivation of this in either my book or online. Can someone please help me get started?



Homework Equations







The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
PV=nRT is all you need. How does n depend on V?

Well, perhaps adding obvious

n_{total} = \sum n_i

will help.
 
Assuming we are dealing with a binary solution, that gets me here...(still stuck)

xi = ni/ntot

ni = PiVi/RT

ntot = PiVi/RT + PjVj/RT

ni/ntot = PiVi/(PiVi + PjVj)

...?


Obviously we want xi to somehow equal Vi/ Vtot
 
You don't have separate PiVi pairs. If you sum partial pressures Pi it is equivalent to assuming all gases occupy the same volume Vtotal, if you sum partial volumes Vi it is equivalent to assuming all gases are under the same pressure Ptotal.
 
Ah, i see what you are saying now.

If we write ni = ViPtot/RT this leads us to the conclusion.

I am curious now why ni = ViPtot/RT = VtotPi/RT in general
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top