Damped Oscillation: Understanding Phase Difference

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of resonance oscillation in pendulums, specifically addressing a perceived contradiction regarding phase differences. It highlights that while the natural frequency of a driven pendulum matches that of a resonant pendulum, there can be a phase difference of T/4, which does not contradict resonance principles. The conversation also distinguishes between the resonance of individual pendulums and that of coupled systems, suggesting that coupling can create new resonance frequencies. Participants express confusion over the term "friver pendulum," with one suggesting it may be a typo for "driver pendulum." Overall, the dialogue emphasizes the complexities of resonance and phase relationships in oscillatory systems.
cutesoqq
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
In my notes, there are two sentences make me feel strange...

As we know, the pendulum whose length equals to that of the friver pendulum, its natural frequency of oscillation if the same of the frequency of the driving one. This is known as resonance oscillation.

However, somewhere I found another sentence...

"The resonant pendulum, is always a quarter of an oscillation behind the friver pendulu, i.e.there is a phase difference of T/4"

I don't know why there is a phase difference, if there is, then I think it contradicts the definition of resonance oscillation. :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general, the phase difference is a function of the frequency and damping. At the resonant frequency, and at optimal damping (\gamma=w_0), the phase difference is \pi/4.

This does not contradict the idea of resonance as this IS the frequency where the amplitude is maximum.
 
Objects resonate, and systems resonate, driving forces don't resonate, per se. I will have to look up this friver pendulum, but the driving point does not have to be in phase with an object at resonance unless it is directly driving the property of consideration. For instance, if you directly and rigidly grab the pendulum's cable and forcefully swing it back and forth, then you would need to stay in phase to induce resonance. If, however, you have a really loose spring attached to the driving point, then you have to take into account the delay in the spring. Delay in response at a certain frequency is the same thing as phase lag.

I couldn't find anything about a friver pendulum. Can you explain what it is? BTW, if you meant "driver pendulum," then I appoligize. I'm not trying to make fun of you or anything. Even if you did mean driver pendulum, I still don't quite have a picture in my mind of the set-up.

Something that just came to mind:
There may be two resonance conditions. One is the resonance of an individual pendulum and the other is the resonance of a coupled two-pendulum system. Even if these two pendulums have the same resonance frequency, their coupling can give you a new resonance frequency. In fact, there will be two natural frequencies for the coupled two-pendulum system.
 
Last edited:
I thought 'friver' was a typo for 'driver' !
 
right... driven = driving in my notes...i feel troublesome with these words too...
 
Well, I don't know what a driver pendulum is. Please explain.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top