Damped Oscillator: Finding Work Rate & Average Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanaBug28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damped Oscillator
DanaBug28
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am really struggling with this question...

Question: Consider a damped oscillator, with natural frequency w_0 (omega_0) and damping constant B (beta) both fixed, that is driven by a force F(t)= F_0*cos(wt). Find the rate P(t) at which F(t) does work and show that the average < P > over any number of complete cycles is mBw^2*A^2.

any help would be amazing!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the rules here stipulate that you need to show some of your own work before you can get specific help on homework problems.
 
work

F(t)=m*f_0*cos(wt) in general
long term motion x(t)=A*cos(wt-delta)
delta= arctan((2Bw)/(w_0^2-w^2))
A^2= (f_0^2)/((w_0^2-w^2)^2+4*B^2*w^2)

< P >=mBw^2*A^2
= m*f_0*cos(wt)*distance

mBw^2*A^2 = mBw^2*(f_0^2)/((w_0^2-w^2)^2+4*B^2*w^2) = m*f_0*cos(wt)*distance

cancel stuff...

B*w^2*(f_0)/((w_0^2-w^2)^2+4*B^2*w^2) = cos(wt)*distance

uh...help? :rolleyes:
 
To calculuate the average power over a period you need to evaluate the integral

&lt;P&gt; = \frac {1}{T} \int_0^T F v dt
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top