Damped Simple Harmonic Motion: Finding Amplitude Reduction in Carbon Dioxide

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for the amplitude of a pendulum's oscillation to decrease from 10 cm to 5 cm in carbon dioxide, given the amplitude reduction in air. The user applies Stokes Law and sets up equations based on the relationship between viscosity and amplitude decay. They express uncertainty about their approach, particularly in dividing the equations to isolate variables. The solution involves finding the decay constant (k) from the first equation and substituting it into the second equation to solve for time. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly manipulating the equations to find the desired time.
erisedk
Messages
372
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


The amplitude of a simple pendulum oscillating in air with a small spherical bob, decreases from 10 cm to 8 cm in 40 seconds. Assuming that Stokes Law is valid, and ratio of the coefficient of viscosity of air to that of carbon dioxide is 1.3, the time in which amplitude of this pendulum will reduce from 10 cm to 5 cm in carbon dioxide will be close to (ln 5 = 1.601, ln 2 = 0.693)

Homework Equations


x(t) = Ae-bt/2m cos(ωt + Φ)

The Attempt at a Solution


I suppose that b ∝ viscosity
So, assuming b/2m = k
8 = 10e-k×40 ------- (1)
5 = 10e-k×t/1.3 ---------- (2)
Dividing 1/2 --
8/5 = ekt/1.3 - 40k

I have no idea what to do beyond this, I haven't been given values for b or m. Also, my solution may be very wrong because I'm not sure about this at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why did you divide [1] by [2]?
 
Oh my god, this is embarrassing. Got it, two equations, two unknowns. Thank you :D
 
using equation 1 , find k value and put that in equation 2 to find the value of time
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top