B Dark Energy & Expansion of Spacetime

member 563992
PLEASE BE ADVISED: I'm a complete ignorant with regards to the details of what I'm about to say and I've never looked at the mathematics of the subject, let alone understand it. So most of what I am about to say comes from pop science. Excuse me in advance if I sound stupid or rhetorical.

----------------

My question: how is space being accelerated in it's expansion? I think:

1. It happens everywhere (inside galaxies etc.)
2. However, within galaxies, G > than the force of dark energy thus we don't see it
3. It must act on the whole scale of the universe where it becomes visible between galaxies (that's how we measured it -- as per supernova's)
4. Therefore I've some discomfort with this situation, namely:

a) How come is the force of gravity bigger than dark energy at those scales? How do we explain it? What model do we use and what data? Is there any link between dark matter and dark energy? Could dark matter override dark energy in galaxies/galaxy clusters?
Physicists tend to emphasize how tiny is the force of gravity compared to the other forces (i.e. strong nuclear force) but nobody seems to have a word of how even tinier the force of dark energy is - why is that?

b) Does it mean that "empty space" is acted upon by dark energy but when (dark) matter is present it tells space how to curve and also how to expand or how to avoid expanding in that region/area? Would this even make sense? Probably not: it would just overcome the force as we see it in atoms: we don't see gravity effect on such scale (i.e. weak nuclear force is much much bigger than gravity yet we don't disregard gravity, we simply state it's insignificant at that scale, but at larger scales obviously, gravity does play a role we can observe -- so it's scales between dark gravity <-> dark energy? or could there be a relationship in terms of interacting fields?).

c) How can this play into our model of quantum gravity (for further explorations) and just ordinary current models?

-------------------

[Moderator's note: second part moved to separate thread.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ToddM4 said:
I'm a complete ignorant with regards to the details of what I'm about to say and I've never looked at the mathematics of the subject, let alone understand it. So most of what I am about to say comes from pop science.

This should be a red flag that you should take a look at a source that is not pop science. You can't learn actual science from pop science sources.

ToddM4 said:
how is space being accelerated in it's expansion

Do you mean just the expansion itself, or the effects of dark energy? They're not the same thing.

The expansion itself exerts no "force" at all; it's just inertia. Things are moving apart and inertia keeps them moving apart.

Dark energy does exert a "force", in the sense that if you pick any two free-floating objects in a spacetime with dark energy, the dark energy will cause them to accelerate away from each other. But the magnitude of the acceleration varies with the distance between the two objects. That's why the effects of dark energy are completely negligible on scales such as our solar system or our galaxy or even clusters of galaxies. You have to get up to separations of hundreds of millions to billions of light-years before the acceleration caused by dark energy becomes significant.

ToddM4 said:
"empty space"

Notice that I said all that above without once using the term "space" (much less "empty space"). "Space" is not something physical; it's an artifact of how you choose your coordinates. Spacetime is the physical thing. The "acceleration" caused by dark energy can be thought of as an effect of the way dark energy curves spacetime.

ToddM4 said:
More of my confusion

This belongs in a separate thread, and will be moved to one shortly.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top