Dark matter affecting galaxy rotation

AI Thread Summary
Dark matter significantly influences galaxy rotation, as stars orbiting galactic centers move at speeds that would cause them to escape if only ordinary matter were present. The rotation rate of stars depends on the total mass within their orbit, which can be measured through spectral analysis of light emitted from the galaxy. Observations reveal that the mass calculated from visible light falls short of the mass required to maintain these rotation speeds, indicating the presence of additional unseen mass. This discrepancy is consistent across numerous galaxies, suggesting a universal phenomenon. Anomalous rotation is not the sole evidence for dark matter; other supporting observations include gravitational lensing and the application of the virial theorem to galaxy clusters.
billy_boy_999
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
i don't understand how dark matter acts upon the rotation of a galaxy. galaxy rotation doesn't work the same way that solar system rotation does in that it's not a simple gradient of further planets rotate slower, right? nor is it further planets rotate faster, like a vinyl record...i take it our galaxy's rotation is a tad more complex, can anyone explain more lucidly the problems we have run into with trying to figure out the gravitational workings of our galaxy and how dark matter enters into the equation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Qualitatively, the essential point is that stars are revolving around galactic centers at a speed which would lead to them leaving the galaxy if the only matter there was ordinary matter (visible or otherwise). That is, more mass is needed to hold the galaxy together against centrifugal force.
 
With some important caveats, the rate at which a star rotates about the centre of the galaxy it's in depends only on the total mass 'interior' (between the star and the centre of the galaxy) to the star. Therefore, if you can measure the speed with which stars are moving around the centre of a galaxy, as a function of distance from the centre, you can determine the mass of the galaxy, as a function of that same distance.

That's what 'galaxy rotation rates' is shorthand for; you put the slit of your spectroscope along the observed plane of the galaxy (making sure you centre it on the galaxy nucleus), then the deviation of the spectal lines (e.g. HII, [OII], Ca II) from the centre will measure this rotation function. (there are other ways to get it too).

We think we know how to estimate the total amount of 'normal' mass from the observed total 'light' (I'm simplifying a lot). When you plug these numbers in, you find an astonishing thing - there seems to be more mass in a galaxy (as you go further out from the nucleus) than you can account for from the 'light' ... and it gets worse the further out you go.

Oh, and it's not just 'cause we only looked at a dozen or three galaxies; it seems to be just about every galaxy (some notable exceptions).
 
informative, thanks a lot guys...can i clarify something? is anomalous galactic rotation the ONLY evidence we have of the existence of dark matter? that is, if tomorrow we found out that galactic rotation is dependent on some kind of gravity degredation, like maybe gravitons disperse over large distances or something farfetched, would that completely dissolve the dark matter question?
 
Originally posted by billy_boy_999
informative, thanks a lot guys...can i clarify something? is anomalous galactic rotation the ONLY evidence we have of the existence of dark matter? that is, if tomorrow we found out that galactic rotation is dependent on some kind of gravity degredation, like maybe gravitons disperse over large distances or something farfetched, would that completely dissolve the dark matter question?
Please read the long sticky thread in GA&C, it's all about exactly this question.

In a nutshell:
- gravitation lensing
- virial theorem applied to cluster velocities
- IGM equilibrium pressure and temperature
- LSS theories
- ...
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top